Government shutdowns hamper progress in materials research
- PDF / 271,181 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 585 x 783 pts Page_size
- 76 Downloads / 239 Views
		    Government shutdowns hamper progress in materials research
 
 G
 
 overnments across the globe fund science to build an edge in innovation and technology, which pushes the boundaries of human knowledge, enables economic growth, and provides national security. So what happens to science when governments shut down? Following the most recent partial government shutdown in the United States that spanned between December 21, 2018 and January 25, 2019, the impacts are still being determined. For science, this question does not have a single, simple answer because it depends on the duration of the shutdown,
 
 the parts of the government impacted, and even the timing of the shutdown. But one thing is for sure—government shutdowns aren’t good for science. During the 34-day shutdown—the longest in US history—many researchers and scientific societies called on the government to find a solution. David Norton, vice president for Research at the University of Florida and the chair of the Materials Research Society (MRS) Government Affairs Committee, wrote an opinion piece that was published in the Tampa Bay Times about the impacts of the shutdown
 
 Table I: Funding gaps of the modern US budget process. Fiscal Year
 
 President
 
 Length*
 
 Shutdown
 
 1977
 
 Ford
 
 10 days
 
 No
 
 1978
 
 Carter
 
 12 days
 
 No
 
 1978
 
 Carter
 
 8 days
 
 No
 
 1978
 
 Carter
 
 8 days
 
 No
 
 1979
 
 Carter
 
 17 days
 
 No
 
 1980
 
 Carter
 
 11 days
 
 No
 
 1982
 
 Reagan
 
 2 days
 
 Yes - partial
 
 1983
 
 Reagan
 
 1 day
 
 No
 
 1983
 
 Reagan
 
 3 days
 
 No
 
 1984
 
 Reagan
 
 3 days
 
 No
 
 1985
 
 Reagan
 
 2 days
 
 No
 
 1985
 
 Reagan
 
 1 day
 
 Yes – partial
 
 1987
 
 Reagan
 
 1 day
 
 Yes – partial
 
 1988
 
 Reagan
 
 1 day
 
 No
 
 1991
 
 Bush
 
 3 days
 
 Yes – partial
 
 1996
 
 Clinton
 
 5 days
 
 Yes – partial (3/13 already passed)
 
 1996
 
 Clinton
 
 21 days
 
 Yes – partial (7/13 already passed)
 
 2014
 
 Obama
 
 16 days
 
 Yes – full
 
 2018
 
 Trump
 
 2 days
 
 Yes – full
 
 2019
 
 Trump
 
 34 days
 
 Yes – partial (5/12 already passed) Source: CRS data
 
 * CRS calculated the length of funding lapses based on the total number of full days for which there was
 
 no budget authority. For example, for the latest shutdown, budget authority expired at the end of the day on December 21, 2018, and new budget authority was enacted on January 25, 2019, yielding a funding gap of 34 full days. Tan highlighting indicates funding gaps prior to the Civiletti opinion letters for which there was no government shutdown regardless of the length of funding lapse.
 
 234
 
 on science. “In research and innovation, time to success is often the difference between leading the world or being just another also-ran. Each day of the shutdown eats away at our competitiveness as institutions and as a nation,” Norton wrote. MRS also took action through its Materials Voice letter campaign to the US Congress and the White House. The letter called for a bipartisan solution to resolve the shutdown, stating “The damaging effects of the shutdown on science are more subtle than airline safety or food inspections, but they are long lasting and irreversible. It will take years, if ever, for the scientific c		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	