Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients

  • PDF / 668,799 Bytes
  • 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 96 Downloads / 192 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


and Other Interventional Techniques

2020 SAGES ORAL

Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients Sharbel A. Elhage1 · Matthew N. Marturano1 · Eva B. Deerenberg1 · Jenny M. Shao1 · Tanushree Prasad1 · Paul D. Colavita1 · Kent W. Kercher1 · B. Todd Heniford1 · Vedra A. Augenstein1  Received: 5 April 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Introduction  In complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), the role of concomitant panniculectomy has been debated due to concern for increased wound complications that impact outcomes; however, long-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) have not been well described. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes and QOL in patients undergoing AWR with panniculectomy utilizing 3D volumetric-based propensity match. Methods  A prospective database from a tertiary referral hernia center was queried for patients undergoing open AWR. 3D CT volumetrics were analyzed and a propensity match comparing AWR patients with and without panniculectomy was created including subcutaneous fat volume (SFV). QOL was analyzed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale. Results  Propensity match yielded 312 pairs, all with adequate CT imaging for volumetric analysis. The panniculectomy group had a higher BMI (p = 0.03) and were more likely female (p  0.05). Overall wound occurrences were higher in the panniculectomy group at 44.5% versus 32.3% (p = 0.002); however, when individual wound complications were assessed (Table 3), the break point for the difference was that the panniculectomy group had a higher rate of superficial wound breakdown (p = 0.003) only. Hernia recurrence was similar between the groups with over two years (28 months) of follow-up (p > 0.05). Quality of life data were obtained at 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months. Data were available on an average of 139 patients for each time period. At 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months, mesh sensation, pain, activity limitation, Table 1  Patients characteristics

Age (years) Female BMI (kg/m2) Comorbidity  Cirrhosis  Congestive heart failure  COPD  Coronary artery disease  Current steroid use  Diabetes mellitus  History of smoking  Obstructive sleep apnea  Peripheral vascular disease ASA score  I  II  III  IV

No panniculectomy (n = 312)

Panniculectomy (n = 312)

p-value

58.9 ± 12.2 52.6% 34.7 ± 7.4

58.6 ± 11.7 71.2% 35.7 ± 7.1

0.96   0.99 0.65 0.65 0.17

LOS length of stay, AKI acute kidney injury, DVT deep venous thrombus, PE pulmonary embolism, MI myocardial infarction

and overall quality of life were all similar between the two groups (all p > 0.05). At 12 months, mesh sensation, pain, and overall quality of life remain similar (all p > 0.05); however, activity limitation was bothersome in a higher number

13

of panniculectomy patients (p = 0.04). QOL outcomes are shown in Fig. 1.

Discussion This study of 624 patients, who constituted 312 one-to-one propensity matched pairs undergoing complex,