Information uncertainty: a correlate for acute stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak in China
- PDF / 344,177 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 97 Downloads / 140 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Information uncertainty: a correlate for acute stress disorder during the COVID-19 outbreak in China Danhua Lin1, Daniela B. Friedman2, Shan Qiao2,3, Cheuk Chi Tam2,3, Xiaoyan Li1 and Xiaoming Li2,3*
Abstract Background: Individuals’ stress in responding to the current COVID-19 pandemic may be exacerbated by information uncertainty driven by inconsistent, unverified, and conflicting news from various sources. The current study aims to test if information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak was related to acute stress disorder (ASD) over and above other psychosocial stressors. Methods: An anonymous online survey was conducted with 7800 college students throughout China from January 31 through February 11, 2020. Existing scales were modified to measure ASD and six potential stressors including information uncertainty during the COVID-19 outbreak. Hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to assess the unique association of information uncertainty with ASD. To minimize the effect of large sample size and also to get a sense of whether the effects of information uncertainty were similar to people at the center of the epidemic, we repeated the hierarchical regression among 10% of the students who were randomly selected from the entire sample (“10% random sample”; n = 780) and 226 students from Hubei Province where the outbreak started. Results: Information uncertainty was highly prevalent among the respondents (64%). It was significantly associated with ASD beyond other key variables and potential stressors across three samples. In the hierarchical regression among the entire sample, demographic variables accounted for 9.4% of the variance in ASD. The other five stressors added 5.1% of the variance. The information uncertainty (β = .159; p < .001) explained an additional 2.1% of the variance. Likewise, the information uncertainty explained an additional 2.1 and 3.4% of the variance in ASD beyond all other variables among the 10% random sample (β = .165; p < .001) and the Hubei sample (β = .196; p < .01), respectively. (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected] 2 Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA 3 South Carolina SmartState Center for Healthcare Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Room 408, Columbia, SC 29208, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If
Data Loading...
