On the co-rotational method for geometrically nonlinear topology optimization
- PDF / 3,190,170 Bytes
- 18 Pages / 595.224 x 790.955 pts Page_size
- 79 Downloads / 251 Views
RESEARCH PAPER
On the co-rotational method for geometrically nonlinear topology optimization Peter D. Dunning1 Received: 18 October 2019 / Revised: 18 March 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 © The Author(s) 2020
Abstract This paper investigates the application of the co-rotational method to solve geometrically nonlinear topology optimization problems. The main benefit of this approach is that the tangent stiffness matrix is naturally positive definite, which avoids some numerical issues encountered when using other approaches. Three different methods for constructing the tangent stiffness matrix are investigated: a simplified method, where the linear elastic stiffness matrix is simply rotated; the consistent method, where the tangent stiffness is derived by differentiating residual forces by displacements; and a symmetrized method, where the consistent tangent stiffness is approximated by a symmetric matrix. The co-rotational method is implemented for 2D plane quadrilateral elements and 3-node shell elements. Matlab code is given in the appendix to modify an existing, freely available, density-based topology optimization code so it can solve 2D problems with geometric nonlinear analysis using the co-rotational method. The approach is used to solve four benchmark problems from the literature, including optimizing for stiffness, compliant mechanism design, and a plate problem. The solutions are comparable with those obtained with other methods, demonstrating the potential of the co-rotational method as an alternative approach for geometrically nonlinear topology optimization. However, there are differences between the methods in terms of implementation effort, computational cost, final design, and objective value. In summary, schemes involving the symmetrized tangent stiffness did not outperform the other schemes. For problems where the optimal design has relatively small displacements, then the simplified method is suitable. Otherwise, it is recommended to use the consistent method, as it is the most accurate. Keywords Nonlinear geometry · Topology optimization · Co-rotational method · Compliant mechanism
1 Introduction Research into structural topology optimization considering nonlinear geometry goes back to Jog (1996), who included its effect when optimizing for thermoelastic properties. Since then, there has been increasing interest in geometrically nonlinear topology optimization, due to the observation that, for some problems, the nonlinear and linear responses of a structure are significantly different. Thus, the optimal design can also be significantly different if nonlinear modeling is used instead of linear modeling. Responsible Editor: Zhen Luo Peter D. Dunning
[email protected] 1
School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, UK
Several authors have investigated the effect of nonlinear geometry on the optimal design of stiff structures, for example Buhl et al. (2000), Bruns and Tortorelli (2001), and Gea and Luo (2001). This research showed that when nonlinear geometric effe
Data Loading...
