Outcomes and management approaches of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta based on the income of c
- PDF / 527,512 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 53 Downloads / 165 Views
(2020) 15:57
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Outcomes and management approaches of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta based on the income of countries Ramiro Manzano-Nunez1,2,3,4*, David McGreevy3, Claudia P. Orlas1, Alberto F. García5, Tal M. Hörer3, Joseph DuBose6, Carlos A. Ordoñez5 and on behalf of the AAST-AORTA Investigators and the ABOTrauma Registry Group
Abstract Background: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could provide a survival benefit to severely injured patients as it may improve their initial ability to survive the hemorrhagic shock. Although the evidence supporting the use of REBOA is not conclusive, its use has expanded worldwide. We aim to compare the management approaches and clinical outcomes of trauma patients treated with REBOA according to the countries’ income based on the World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Methods: We used data from the AORTA (USA) and the ABOTrauma (multinational) registries. Patients were stratified into two groups: (1) high-income countries (HICs) and (2) low-to-middle income countries (LMICs). Propensity score matching extracted 1:1 matched pairs of subjects who were from an LMIC or a HIC based on age, gender, the presence of pupillary response on admission, impeding hypotension (SBP ≤ 80), trauma mechanism, ISS, the necessity of CPR on arrival, the location of REBOA insertion (emergency room or operating room) and the amount of PRBCs transfused in the first 24 h. Logistic regression (LR) was used to examine the association of LMICs and mortality. Results: A total of 817 trauma patients from 14 countries were included. Blind percutaneous approach and surgical cutdown were the preferred means of femoral cannulation in HICs and LIMCs, respectively. Patients from LMICs had a significantly higher occurrence of MODS and respiratory failure. LR showed no differences in mortality for LMICs when compared to HICs; neither in the non-matched cohort (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.36‑1.09; p = 0.1) nor in the matched cohort (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 0.63‑3,33; p = 0.3). (Continued on next page)
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Clinical Research Center, Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia 2 Universidad del Rosario, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá, Colombia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulati
Data Loading...
