Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct a
- PDF / 633,630 Bytes
- 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 39 Downloads / 132 Views
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Outcomes following emergent open repair for thoracic aortic dissection are improved at higher volume centers in direct admissions and transfers Aurelie E. Merlo1,2, Dhaval Chauhan1,3,6*, Chris Pettit1, Kimberly N. Hong4, Craig R. Saunders5, Chunguang Chen5 and Mark J. Russo1,3,5
Abstract Background: The purpose of this study is (1) to define the proportion of patients undergoing emergent open repair of thoracic aortic dissection admitted directly through the emergency room versus those transferred from outside hospitals and (2) to determine if a volume-outcomes relationship exists for those patients across admission types. Methods: De-identified patient-level data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2004–2008). Patients undergoing emergent aortic surgery for thoracic aortic dissection (n = 1,507) were identified by ICD-9 codes and stratified by annual center volume into low volume (≤5 cases/year) (n = 963; 63.9 %), intermediate volume (6–10 cases/ year) (n = 370; 24.5 %), and high volume (≥11 cases/year) (n = 174; 11.6 %) groups. The analysis was further stratified by admission type: direct admission (DA), transfer admission (TA), and other. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed comparing outcomes between high vs low and high vs intermediate volume centers. Results: Overall in-hospital mortality was 21.8 % (n = 328/1,507). Absolute percent mortality at high volume centers was significantly lower (12.6 %) than at medium (20.6 %) and low volume (23.9 %) centers. For DA patients, mortality was 10.6, 21.4, and 24.0 % for high, medium, and low volume centers respectively. For TA patients, mortality was 10.2, 12.7, and 23.5 % for high, medium, and low volume centers, respectively. Multivariate analysis suggested that patients in low volume center were more likely to die compared to high volume center (Odds Ratio 2.06, 95 % CI 1.25 – 3.38, p = 0.004). Admission source was not associated with increased mortality. Conclusions: Direct admissions comprise the largest proportion of dissections regardless of volume strata, and they comprise the largest proportion in the low and intermediate volume cohorts. Admission to low volume center is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. Patients transferred to high volume centers from low volume centers have similar outcome as direct admits in terms of mortality. Abbreviations: APR-DRG, All patient refined-diagnosis related group; ATAD, Acute thoracic aortic dissection; DA, Direct admits (patients admitted directly to the emergency department); ICD-9-CM, International classification of diseases, ninth revision, clinical modification; IRAD, International registry of acute aortic dissections; NIS, Nationwide inpatient sample; STEMI, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; TA, Transfer admits (patients admitted from an outside hospital)
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Cardiovascular Clinical Research Unit, Barnabas Heart Hospitals, Newark, NJ, USA
Data Loading...
