Patient-related outcome, fracture displacement and bone mineral density following distal radius fracture in young and ol

  • PDF / 1,115,881 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 3 Downloads / 204 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(2020) 21:816

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Patient-related outcome, fracture displacement and bone mineral density following distal radius fracture in young and older men Lisa Egund1,2, Fiona E. McGuigan1, Niels Egund3, Jack Besjakov4 and Kristina E. Åkesson1,2*

Abstract Background: Distal radius fractures can adversely affect wrist function; for men with this fracture, the role played by fracture severity, age and osteoporosis on fracture outcome has not been sufficiently studied. Objective: To describe patient-reported outcome and the association with bone integrity, fracture severity and future fracture risk among young and older men with distal radius fracture. Methods: This prospective study includes 133 men with acute distal radius fracture, mean age 54 (range 21–88), who were followed for 12 months. They were categorized as younger (< 65) and older (65+). Main outcome was DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) at 12 months; DASH > 15 was defined as poor outcome. Fractures were classified and radiographic displacement identified at initial presentation and follow-up. BMD was measured and FRAX 10-year probability of fracture calculated. Results: Disability was higher in older men (DASHmedian 10 vs 2; p = 0.002); a clinically meaningful difference (ΔDASH = 10, p = 0.017) remained after adjustment for displacement, fracture classification and treatment method. Almost 50% of older men vs 14% in younger had poor outcome, p < 0.001. Bone mineral density did not independently predict outcome. Older men with a displaced fracture at initial presentation had greater disability (DASHmedian, IQR 45, 14;73) and risk of fracture (FRAXmajor osteoporotic 14, 8;21). Conclusion: Men over the age of 65 with a distal radius fracture are more likely to have post-fracture disability regardless of radiographic appearance. Fracture displacement, indicating impaired bone strength, is also more common and associated with an increased risk of fracture within 10-years. Secondary fracture prevention should therefore be considered in men presenting with distal radius fracture. Keywords: Distal radius fracture, Men, Function, Displacement, FRAX, BMD, patient-reported outcome

* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Lund University, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden 2 Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to th