Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score-matched analysis

  • PDF / 889,255 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 2 Downloads / 239 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Robotic versus open oncological gastric surgery in the elderly: a propensity score‑matched analysis Giovanni Maria Garbarino1   · Gianluca Costa1 · Barbara Frezza1,2 · Alessia Biancafarina2 · Genoveffa Balducci1 · Paolo Mercantini1 · Marco De Prizio2 · Giovanni Gugliemo Laracca1 · Graziano Ceccarelli2,3 Received: 6 July 2020 / Accepted: 24 October 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Although there is no agreement on a definition of elderly, commonly an age cutoff of ≥ 65 or 75 years is used. Even if robotassisted surgery is a validated option for the elderly population, there are no specific indications for its application in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted gastrectomy and to compare the short and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted (RG) versus open gastrectomy (OG). Patients aged ≥ 70 years old undergoing surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery of San Donato Hospital in Arezzo, between September 2012 and March 2017 were enrolled. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed according to the following variables: age, Sex, BMI, ASA score, comorbidity, T stage and type of resection performed. 43 OG were matched to 43 RG. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the RG group (273.8 vs. 193.5 min, p