SAKK 19/17: safety analysis of first-line durvalumab in patients with PD-L1 positive, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

  • PDF / 626,587 Bytes
  • 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 27 Downloads / 280 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

SAKK 19/17: safety analysis of first‑line durvalumab in patients with PD‑L1 positive, advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2 Michael Mark1   · Patrizia Froesch2 · Eric Innocents Eboulet3 · Alfredo Addeo4 · Miklos Pless5 · Sacha I. Rothschild6 · Wolf‑Dieter Janthur7 · Henning Burmeister8 · Alex Friedlaender4 · Martina Schneider3 · Yannis Metaxas1 · Markus Joerger9 · Luciano Wannesson2 · Michael Schwitter1 · Nathalie Baudoux4 · Susanne Weindler9 · Christine Biaggi‑Rudolf3 · Martin Früh9,10 · for the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Received: 1 September 2020 / Accepted: 14 October 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Introduction  The safety of first-line (1L) durvalumab in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 (PS2) is unknown. This is an interim unplanned safety analysis of the study SAKK 19/17 for patients with metastatic NSCLC with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in ≥ 25% of tumor cells and an ECOG PS2 treated with 1L durvalumab. This safety analysis was triggered by the SAKK data and safety monitoring board due to a high mortality rate observed after the recruitment of the first 21 patients. Methods  This single-arm phase II study recruited patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 in ≥ 25% and ECOG PS2. Patients received durvalumab 1500 mg every four weeks. The trial aims to recruit 48 patients in total. This report includes safety analyses only. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0. Efficacy data including the primary endpoint overall survival at 6 months and secondary endpoints (objective response rate, progression-free survival, and quality of life) will be reported at a later time point. Results  The data from 21 patients were available at this interim safety analysis. Among these, 13 deaths (13/21; 62%) were reported, including one treatment-related fatal colonic perforation at 9 months after treatment initiation (1/13; 8%). Twelve deaths were not treatment-related (12/13; 92%), and mostly attributed to tumor progression (10/13; 77%). Of note, seven deaths (7/13; 54%) occurred during the first 5 weeks (range 0.6–4.7 weeks) after treatment initiation. Four (4/7; 57%) were respiratory failures attributed to tumor progression. One of these patients (25%) had pre-existing COPD, and three (75%) had baseline dyspnea grade 2–3 related to the tumor. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) included colonic perforation (grade 5), abdominal pain, and colitis (grade 3 each) in one patient, and fatigue (grade 3) in another. Other Grade ≥ 3 AEs unrelated to treatment were all of pulmonary origin: lung infections (19%), dyspnea (24%), cough (5%), and bronchial obstruction (5%). Conclusions  1L durvalumab in patients with ECOG PS2 and metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 25% resulted in an unexpectedly high number of fatal early e