Unity, Truth and the Liar The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions

The Liar Paradox challenges logicians’ and semanticists’ theories of truth and meaning. Modern accounts of paradoxes in formal semantics offer solutions through the hierarchy of object language and metalanguage. Yet this solution to the Liar presupposes t

  • PDF / 4,001,595 Bytes
  • 350 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 78 Downloads / 168 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


LOGIC, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND THE UNITY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 8

Editors Shahid Rahman, University of Lille III, France John Symons, University of Texas at El Paso, U.S.A. Editorial Board Jean Paul van Bendegem, Free University of Brussels, Belgium Johan van Benthem, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Jacques Dubucs, University of Paris I-Sorbonne, France Anne Fagot-Largeault Collège de France, France Bas van Fraassen, Princeton University, U.S.A. Dov Gabbay, King’s College London, U.K. Jaakko Hintikka, Boston University, U.S.A. Karel Lambert, University of California, Irvine, U.S.A. Graham Priest, University of Melbourne, Australia Gabriel Sandu, University of Helsinki, Finland Heinrich Wansing, Technical University Dresden, Germany Timothy Williamson, Oxford University, U.K. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science aims to reconsider the question of the unity of science in light of recent developments in logic. At present, no single logical, semantical or methodological framework dominates the philosophy of science. However, the editors of this series believe that formal techniques like, for example, independence friendly logic, dialogical logics, multimodal logics, game theoretic semantics and linear logics, have the potential to cast new light no basic issues in the discussion of the unity of science. This series provides a venue where philosophers and logicians can apply specific technical insights to fundamental philosophical problems. While the series is open to a wide variety of perspectives, including the study and analysis of argumentation and the critical discussion of the relationship between logic and the philosophy of science, the aim is to provide an integrated picture of the scientific enterprise in all its diversity.

For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/6936

Unity,\Truth and\\the\Liar The\Modern\Relevance\of\Medieval Solutions\to\the\Liar\Paradox Edited by

Shahid\Rahman University\Charles-de-Gaulle\-\Lille\III,\France

Tero\Tulenheimo University\of\Helsinki, Finland and

Emmanuel Genot University Charles-de-Gaulle\-\Lille\III,\France

ABC

Emmanuel Genot U.F.R. de Philosophie ,, Domaine Universitaire Pont de Bois Universite´ Lille III , 59653 Villeneuve d Ascq France [email protected] ,,

Shahid Rahman U.F.R. de Philosophie ,, Domaine Universitaire Pont de Bois Universite´ Lille III , 59653 Villeneuve d Ascq France [email protected] ,,

Tero Tulenheimo Department of Philosophy University of Helsinki FI-00014 Helsinki Finland [email protected]

Cover image: Adaptation of a Persian astrolabe (brass, 1712–13), from the collection of the Museum of the History of Science, Oxford. Reproduced by permission.

ISBN 978-1-4020-8467-6

e-ISBN 978-1-4020-8468-3

Library of Congress Control Number: 2008928132 All Rights Reserved c 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. ° No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, micro lming, reco