What is the preferred hemostasis method for coronary angiography through the palmar artery access?
- PDF / 1,020,371 Bytes
- 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 11 Downloads / 200 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
What is the preferred hemostasis method for coronary angiography through the palmar artery access? Farshad Roghani‑Dehkordi1 · Roya Kasiri2 · Mohammad Kermani‑Alghoraishi1 · Mojtaba Akbari3 Received: 15 July 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 © Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics 2020
Abstract Trans-palmar catheterization has been considered to be safe and feasible and choosing a reliable hemostasis method is essential to confirm it. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of three hemostasis approaches containing ulnar TR band, manual compression and wrist hyperextension in patients undergoing trans-palmar coronary angiography (CAG). In a non-randomized clinical trial, a total of 106 patients undergoing diagnostic CAG by tarns-palmar access were divided into three groups: ulnar TR band, manual compression and wrist hyperextension. Duration of primary hemostasis, patient satisfaction, puncture site pain severity, hospitalization time and local neuro-vascular complication were evaluated and compared in hospital and 30 days follow-up. The mean age of the patients was 62.9 ± 7.4 years and 72 patients (67.9%) were male. Primary hemostasis time was significantly shorter in hyperextension (11.5 ± 2.10 min) and manual compression groups (12.3 ± 2.20 min) than with TR band group (24.7 ± 10.25 min) (p value
Data Loading...
