Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comp
Legal studies and consequently legal history focus on constitutional documents, believing in a nominalist autonomy of constitutional semantics.Reconsidering Constitutional Formation in the late 18th and 19th century, kept historic constitut
- PDF / 3,869,406 Bytes
- 296 Pages / 439.43 x 683.15 pts Page_size
- 47 Downloads / 169 Views
Ulrike Müßig Editor
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution
Studies in the History of Law and Justice Volume 6
Series editors Georges Martyn University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium Mortimer Sellers University of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Editorial Board António Pedro Barbas Homem, Universidade de Lisboa Emanuele Conte, Università degli Studi Roma Tre Gigliola di Renzo Villata, Università degli Studi di Milano Markus Dirk Dubber, University of Toronto William Ewald, University of Pennsylvania Law School Igor Filippov, Moscow State University Amalia Kessler, Stanford University Mia Korpiola, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies Aniceto Masferrer, Universidad de Valencia Yasutomo Morigiwa, Nagoya University Graduate School of Law Ulrike Muessig, Universität Passau Sylvain Soleil, Université de Rennes James Q.Whitman, Yale Law School
The purpose of this book series is to publish high quality volumes on the history of law and justice. Legal history can be a deeply provocative and influential field, as illustrated by the growth of the European universities and the ius commune, the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and indeed all the great movements for national liberation through law. The study of history gives scholars and reformers the models and courage to question entrenched injustices, by demonstrating the contingency of law and other social arrangements. Yet legal history today finds itself diminished in the universities and legal academy. Too often scholarship betrays no knowledge of what went before, or why legal institutions took the shape they did. This series seeks to remedy that deficiency. Studies in the History of Law and Justice will be theoretical and reflective. Volumes will address the history of law and justice from a critical and comparative viewpoint. The studies in this series will be strong bold narratives of the development of law and justice. Some will be suitable for a very broad readership. Contributions to this series will come from scholars on every continent and in every legal system. Volumes will promote international comparisons and dialogue. The purpose will be to provide the next generation of lawyers with the models and narratives needed to understand and improve the law and justice of their own era. The series includes monographs focusing on a specific topic, as well as collections of articles covering a theme or collections of article by one author.
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/11794
Ulrike Müßig Editor
Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 339529. ReConFort is a research project in the field of legal history (ERC-AG-SH6 – ERC Advanced Grant – The study of the human past). The positions expre
Data Loading...
