Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making
- PDF / 569,117 Bytes
- 8 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 20 Downloads / 166 Views
(2020) 20:851
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making Søren Birkeland1* , Thea Linkhorst1, Anders Haakonsson1, Michael John Barry2 and Sören Möller1
Abstract Background: Obtaining a sample that is representative of the group of interest is of utmost importance in questionnaire studies. In a survey using a state authorized web-portal for citizen communication with authorities, we wanted to investigate the view of adult men on patient involvement in health care decision-making regarding Prostate-Specific Antigen test for prostatic cancer. In this paper, we report on sample characteristics and representativeness of our sample in terms of personality and baseline involvement preferences. Methods: We compared personality profiles (BFI-10) and baseline healthcare decision-making preferences (CPS) in our sample (n = 6756) to internationally available datasets. Pooled data from a) US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (n = 1512), b) Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Belgium (n = 1136), and c) Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark (n = 1313) were used for BFI-10 comparisons. Regarding CPS, we compared our sample with three previous datasets relating to decision-making in cancer (n = 425, 387, and 199). Results: Although statistically significant differences particularly appeared in large dataset comparisons, sample BFI10 and CPS profiles mostly were within the range of those previously reported. Similarity was greatest in BFI-10 comparisons with group a) where no statistically significant difference could be established in factors ‘agreeableness’ and ‘neuroticism’ (p = .095 and .578, respectively). Conclusion: Despite some variation, our sample displays personality and baseline preference profiles that are generally similar to those described in previous international studies. For example, this was the case with the BFI-10 ‘agreeableness’ measure (incl. trust and fault-finding items), an important factor in healthcare decision-making. Keywords: Research methodology, Internet-based survey, Representativeness, Generalizability, Personality, Decision making, Bioethics, Medical law, Cancer
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9 a, 3. floor, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a c
Data Loading...
