Safety and efficacy of superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal c

  • PDF / 627,129 Bytes
  • 7 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 64 Downloads / 159 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Safety and efficacy of superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal calculi‑ a prospective observational comparative study M. Amaresh1 · P. Hegde1 · A. Chawla1 · J. J. M. C. H. de la Rosette2 · M. P. Laguna2 · A. Kriplani1 Received: 5 May 2020 / Accepted: 11 August 2020 © The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Objective  To compare efficacy and safety between superior calyceal access and inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal stones. Methods  Consecutive patients presenting with Pelvic and/or inferior calyceal renal calculi were allocated to the superior calyceal access (group 1) or inferior calyceal access (group 2) treatment arm. Allocation of treatment access was based on the surgeon’s preference. Variables studied included stone free rate, operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was executed using SPSS, Version 16.0. The statistical significance was evaluated at 5% level of significance (p value