Self-report versus clinical interview: Discordance among measures of binge eating in a weight-loss seeking sample

  • PDF / 547,190 Bytes
  • 5 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 90 Downloads / 134 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


BRIEF REPORT

Self‑report versus clinical interview: Discordance among measures of binge eating in a weight‑loss seeking sample Valerie S. Everett1,2,4   · Rebecca J. Crochiere1,2 · Diane H. Dallal1,2 · Gerald J. Martin3 · Stephanie M. Manasse2 · Evan M. Forman1,2 Received: 9 January 2020 / Accepted: 31 August 2020 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Abstract Purpose  Obese, behavioral weight-loss (BWL) seeking individuals may be prone to over-reporting binge-eating (BE). However, many studies rely on self-reported measures of BE in this population, which may be inaccurate. As such, this is the first-ever study to examine the concordance rates among one self-reported and one clinician- administered measure of BE in a BWL-seeking sample with overweight/obesity. Methods  At baseline of a BWL trial, participants (N = 94) completed two measures of BE: The Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and the interview-based Eating Disorder Examination (EDE, Overeating section). Results  Cohen’s kappa detected poor agreement between measures (κ