Social Dialogue and the regulatory power of governing bodies
- PDF / 440,317 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 80 Downloads / 191 Views
(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)
ARTICLE
Social Dialogue and the regulatory power of governing bodies Andrea Cattaneo1
Ó T.M.C. Asser Instituut 2018
Abstract EU Social Dialogue is an institutionalised set of procedural arrangements that can be used to establish a supranational governance in a broad range of policy fields. Sectoral Social Dialogue constitutes a platform for European representatives on the side of employers and employees to discuss matters of common interest. Arrangements concluded in this forum may be ratified by the EU institutions and translated into binding agreements. Where these would constitute collective bargaining agreements, they would escape the application of competition law, in light of the social policy that they pursue. The supranational nature of the EU Social Dialogue makes it particularly suitable in the sporting sector. Sport is an industry regulated at transnational level, and the differences within labour disciplines in Member States prevent greater integration. In a system where private regulators set rules that have to be applied and enforced within Member States, Social Dialogue is the best possible instrument to guarantee greater representation of athletes in the governance of the system. A sectoral Social Dialogue in football has been already put in place, but, so far, it has only produced arrangement player contract minimum requirements. This paper submits that a greater use of Social Dialogue in the sporting sector would enhance the participation of stakeholders in the setting of rules that regulate their conducts. In turn, these could find greater legitimacy if agreed in the forum and this would entail greater compliance with them and a reduction of challenges under EU competition law. Keywords Social Dialogue Employment relationship Sports governing bodies Antitrust Co-regulation Stakeholders
1 Introduction Football is probably the best example of a true global industry. It is a system with international and global private regulators who have the ability of setting rules and apply them to all the clubs, players, and sportspersons. The supranational nature of this industry requires a supranational system of governance, which overcomes the difficulties of collating different national regulations, which may apply to stakeholders in a different manner depending on where they are located. The labour market in football has been subject to a progressive Europeanisation of industrial relations, a process that started with Bosman.1 The seminal judgment paved the way for greater transnational mobility of football players and increased the need for transnational regulations of the labour market.
Football is, for many aspects, an expression of society. As in other industries, there is a power dynamic that affects the relationship between clubs—the employers—and players— the employees. Similarly, it is assumed that the employees are in a position of weakness, and their rights have to find greater protection in the law. This dynamic is, however, affected by t
Data Loading...
