Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in

  • PDF / 1,036,961 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 63 Downloads / 154 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ): exploring dimensionality and psychometric properties at a tertiary hospital in Australia Yangama Jokwiro1,5*  , Elizabeth Pascoe1, Kristina Edvardsson1, Muhammad Aziz Rahman2, Ewan McDonald1, Qarin Lood1,3 and David Edvardsson1,4

Abstract  Background:  This study explored the psychometric properties and dimensionality of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire (SCQ) in a sample of health professionals from a tertiary-level Australian hospital. The SCQ, a measure of stress of conscience, is a recently developed nine-item instrument for assessing frequently encountered stressful situations in health care, and the degree to which they trouble the conscience of health professionals. This is relevant because stress of conscience has been associated with negative experiences such as job strain and/or burnout. The validity of SCQ has not been explored beyond Scandinavian contexts. Methods:  A cross-sectional study of 253 health professionals was undertaken in 2015. The analysis involved estimates of reliability, variability and dimensionality. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to explore dimensionality and theoretical model fit respectively. Results:  Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84 showed internal consistency reliability. All individual items of the SCQ (N = 9) met the cut-off criteria for item-total correlations (> 0.3) indicating acceptable homogeneity. Adequate variability was confirmed for most of the items, with some items indicating floor or ceiling effects. EFA retained a single latent factor with adequate factor loadings for a unidimensional structure. When the two‐factor model was compared to the one‐factor model, the latter achieved better goodness of fit supporting a one-factor model for the SCQ. Conclusion:  The SCQ, as a unidimensional measure of stress of conscience, achieved adequate reliability and variability in this study. Due to unidimensionality of the tool, summation of a total score can be a meaningful way forward to summarise and communicate results from future studies, enabling international comparisons. However, further exploration of the questionnaire in other cultures and clinical settings is recommended to explore the stability of the latent one-factor structure. Keywords:  Stress of conscience, Psychometrics, Dimensionality, Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, Health professionals

*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 College of Science, Health and Engineering, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Background The term ‘stress of conscience’ has emerged to conceptualise an existential dimension of stress health professionals may develop from frequently encountered stressful situations in health care, perceived as leading to a troubled conscience [1–4]. Despite the heterogeneity of clinical settings, the generic sources of frequently encountere