The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health
- PDF / 782,354 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 595.276 x 793.701 pts Page_size
- 27 Downloads / 205 Views
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Open Access
The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation Anthony Lacouture1,2,3*, Eric Breton1,2, Anne Guichard4 and Valéry Ridde3,5
Abstract Background: Public health interventions are complex by nature, and their evaluation requires unpacking their intervention logic and their interactions with open social systems. By focusing on the interrelationships between context, mechanism, and outcome, Pawson and Tilley’s realist approach appears a promising innovation for public health-related evaluation works. However, and as expected of any methodological innovation, this approach is being constructed gradually by answering the multiple challenges to its operationalization that fall in its path. One of these challenges, users of this approach agree on, is the necessity of clarifying its key concept of mechanism. Method: We first collected the definitions of mechanism from published works of Pawson and colleagues. Secondly, a scoping review was conducted to identify the ones quoted by users of the realist approach for evaluating public health interventions (1997–2012). We then appraised the clarity and precision of this concept against the three dimensions defined by Daigneault and Jacobs “term, sense and referent.” Results: Of the 2344 documents identified in the scoping review, 49 documents were included. Term: Users of the realist approach use adjectives qualifying the term mechanism that were not specifically endorsed by Pawson and colleagues. Sense: None of the attributes stated by Pawson and colleagues has been listed in all of the documents analyzed, and some contributions clarified its attributes. Referent: The concept of mechanism within a realist approach can be ascribed to theory-based evaluation, complex social interventions, and critical realism. Conclusion: This review led us to reconsider the concept of mechanism within the realist approach by confronting the theoretical stance of its proponents to the practical one of its users. This resulted in a clearer, more precise definition of the concept of mechanism which may in turn trigger further improvements in the way the realist approach is applied in evaluative practice in public health and potentially beyond. A mechanism is hidden but real, is an element of reasoning and reactions of agents in regard to the resources available in a given context to bring about changes through the implementation of an intervention, and evolves within an open space-time and social system of relationships. Keywords: Mechanism, Realist approach, Evaluation, Realism, Conceptual analysis, Public health intervention, Complexity, Context
* Correspondence: [email protected] 1 EHESP French School of Public Health, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Rennes, France 2 CNRS, UMR CRAPE Centre for Research on Political Action in Europe—6051, Rennes, France Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2015 Lacouture et al. Open Access This article is d
Data Loading...
