The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion
The pragma-dialectical approach to legal argumentation conceives the justification of a judicial decision as part of a critical discussion. In this approach it is assumed that a legal argumentation theory should integrate descriptive and normative perspec
- PDF / 2,266,559 Bytes
- 239 Pages / 439.36 x 666.15 pts Page_size
- 113 Downloads / 151 Views
Law and Philosophy Library VOLUME 102
Series Editors: FRANCISCO J. LAPORTA, Department of Law, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain FREDERICK SCHAUER, School of Law, University of Virginia, U.S.A. TORBEN SPAAK, Uppsala University, Sweden Former Series Editors: AULIS AARNIO, MICHAEL D. BAYLES , CONRAD D. JOHNSON , ALAN MABE, ALEKSANDER PECZENIK Editorial Advisory Board: AULIS AARNIO, Secretary General of the Tampere Club, Finland ´ HUMBERTO AVILA, Federal University of South Brazil, Brazil ZENON BANKOWSKI, Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom PAOLO COMANDUCCI, University of Genoa, Italy HUGH CORDER, University of Cape Town, South Africa DAVID DYZENHAUS, University of Toronto, Canada ´ VALDES, ´ Institut f¨ur Politikwissenschaft, Johannes ERNESTO GARZON Gutenberg Universitat, Mainz, Germany RICCARDO GUASTINI, University of Genoa, Italy JOHN KLEINIG, Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, U.S.A. PATRICIA MINDUS, Universit`a Degli Studi di Torino, Italy YASUTOMO MORIGIWA, Nagoya University, Japan GIOVANNI BATTISTA RATTI, “Juan de la Cierva” Fellow in Law, Faculty of Law, University of Girona, Spain WOJCIECH SADURSKI, European University Institute, Department of Law, Florence, Italy HORACIO SPECTOR, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina ROBERT S. SUMMERS, School of Law, Cornell University, U.S.A. MICHEL TROPER, Membre de l’Institut Universitaire de France, France CARL WELLMAN, Department of Philosophy, Washington University, U.S.A.
For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/6210
Christian Dahlman • Eveline Feteris Editors
Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives
123
Editors Christian Dahlman Faculty of Law Lund University, Lund Sweden
Eveline Feteris University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
ISSN 1572-4395 ISBN 978-94-007-4669-5 ISBN 978-94-007-4670-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012947411 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained f
Data Loading...
