Thermal Conductivity Reduction of SiGe Nanocomposites

  • PDF / 256,894 Bytes
  • 6 Pages / 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page_size
  • 108 Downloads / 247 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


S7.2.1

Thermal Conductivity Reduction of SiGe Nanocomposites T. Harris1, H. Lee1, D. Z. Wang2, J. Y. Huang2, Z. F. Ren2, B. Klotz3, R. Dowding3, M. S. Dresselhaus4, and G. Chen1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, U.S.A. 2 Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02476, USA 3 Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5069, USA 4 Department of Physics and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT ABSTRACT High figure of merit has been reported in superlattice structures in recent years mainly due to a large reduction in thermal conductivity, while maintaining or even enhancing the power factor. These findings suggest the possibility of using nanocomposites to reduce a material’s thermal conductivity and thereby increasing the thermoelectric figure of merit. The current work reports on the thermal conductivity of various Si-Ge nanocomposites synthesized in a simple and straightforward process that allows one to exploit nanoscale physics while rapidly producing macroscale devices. Composite synthesis consisted of combining Si nanoparticles approximately 70 nm in diameter with micron-sized Ge particles in various atomic ratios via hotpressing to form macroscale samples. Room-temperature thermal conductivity was measured for each of the nanocomposite samples and compared with the values of SiGe bulk alloys. In this preliminary work, we observed a significant reduction in bulk thermal conductivity in such materials. INTRODUCTION The efficiency and energy density of a thermoelectric device is determined by the dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit, ZT,

ZT =

S 2σ T, k

(1)

where S is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity, T is the absolute temperature, and k is the thermal conductivity of the material. Recent results of high-ZT superlattice (SL) structures [1, 2] show that for comparable power factors (S2σ) between the SL structure and its bulk counterpart, a substantial reduction in k has been observed. This result is elucidated in Table 1 and leads one to believe that by substantially reducing the thermal conductivity of a material, while maintaining the material’s power factor, one can achieve a large ZT enhancement.

S7.2.2

Power Factor, S2σ [µW/cm-K2] Conductivity, k [W/mK]

PbSeTe/PbTe Nanostructure 32 0.6

[1] Bulk 28 2.5

Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 Nanostructure 40 0.5

[2] Bulk 35 2

Table 1. Power factor and thermal conductivity for high-ZT structures [1] and [2]. Bulk values were estimated from [3]. The observed power factors for both instances are comparable, but the conductivities between the nanostructures and the bulk show a substantial difference.

Recent theoretical work [4] regarding the thermal conductivity for both in-plane and cross-plane thermal conductivity of SL thin films shows that phonon coherence is not necessary to achieve a reduction in thermal conductivity. The key ingredient for achieving a “low” thermal conductivity lies in the reduction of the