Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience
- PDF / 199,791 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 610 x 792 pts Page_size
- 21 Downloads / 157 Views
BioMed Central
Open Access
Research
Using process evaluation for program improvement in dose, fidelity and reach: the ACT trial experience Dawn K Wilson*1, Sarah Griffin2, Ruth P Saunders3, Heather KitzmanUlrich1, Duncan C Meyers1 and Leslie Mansard1 Address: 1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA, 2Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Heath, Education, and Human Development, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA and 3Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA Email: Dawn K Wilson* - [email protected]; Sarah Griffin - [email protected]; Ruth P Saunders - [email protected]; Heather Kitzman-Ulrich - [email protected]; Duncan C Meyers - [email protected]; Leslie Mansard - [email protected] * Corresponding author
Published: 30 November 2009 International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2009, 6:79
doi:10.1186/1479-5868-6-79
Received: 10 July 2009 Accepted: 30 November 2009
This article is available from: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/6/1/79 © 2009 Wilson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate how formative program process evaluation was used to improve dose and fidelity of implementation, as well as reach of the intervention into the target population, in the "Active by Choice Today" (ACT) randomized schoolbased trial from years 1 to 3 of implementation. Methods: The intervention integrated constructs from Self-Determination Theory and Social Cognitive Theory to enhance intrinsic motivation and behavioral skills for increasing long-term physical activity (PA) behavior in underserved adolescents (low income, minorities). ACT formative process data were examined at the end of each year to provide timely, corrective feedback to keep the intervention "on track". Results: Between years 1 and 2 and years 2 and 3, three significant changes were made to attempt to increase dose and fidelity rates in the program delivery and participant attendance (reach). These changes included expanding the staff training, reformatting the intervention manual, and developing a tracking system for contacting parents of students who were not attending the after-school programs regularly. Process outcomes suggest that these efforts resulted in notable improvements in attendance, dose, and fidelity of intervention implementation from years 1 to 2 and 2 to 3 of the ACT trial. Conclusion: Process evaluation methods, particularly implementation monitoring, are useful tools to ensure fidelity in intervention trials and for identifying key best practices for intervention delivery.
Introduction Process eva
Data Loading...
