Communicative interventions for collective action in the management of potato late blight: evidence from a framed field

  • PDF / 758,889 Bytes
  • 17 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 26 Downloads / 173 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL PAPER

Communicative interventions for collective action in the management of potato late blight: evidence from a framed field game experiment in Ethiopia Elias Damtew 1,2 & Cees Leeuwis 1 & Paul C Struik 3 & Francesco Cecchi 4 & Barbara van Mierlo 1 & Rico Lie 1 & Berga Lemaga 2 & Katarzyna Cieslik 1,5 Received: 12 May 2020 / Accepted: 30 October 2020 # The Author(s) 2020

Abstract Potato late blight remains a threat to food security and livelihood of millions of people in Ethiopia. Despite a rapid dispersal of the disease pathogen and farmers’ interdependency in managing it, the literature on agricultural extension and communication tends to frame the disease and its management as a problem of the individual farmer. This study appreciates late blight as a collective action problem whose management requires a corresponding re-configuration in information sharing and communicative practices. We employ a framed field game experiment with a mixed quantitative and qualitative method to explore how and to what extent different types and combinations of communicative interventions affect collective action in the management of the disease among farmers in Ethiopia. Interestingly, our quantitative findings revealed that the provision of technical information about interdependency involved in the management of the disease and social monitoring information about the management practices of other farmers negatively affected collective action. However, collective action performance significantly improved when farmers were given the opportunity to interactively communicate about their management strategies. Further qualitative investigation sheds light on how farmers used and made sense of the different communicative interventions to inform and adjust their individual decisions, coordinate collective strategies, pressure free-riders, and develop a shared identity. It is concluded that interventions that mainly promote the provision of technical and social information can be counterproductive in managing collective action problems such as late blight unless it is complemented with interactive communication and deliberation processes. Keywords Potato late blight . Collective action . Communicative intervention . Information . Interdependency . Smartphones

1 Introduction

* Elias Damtew [email protected] 1

Knowledge, Technology and Innovation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

2

CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), International Potato Center (CIP), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

3

Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

4

Development Economics Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

5

Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Potato late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary, is the major bottleneck in potato production, a crop that holds promise for food security and livelihood improvement to millions of people in Ethiopia (Demissie 2019; Tsedaley 2014). Since late bli