Constitutional Democracy in a Multicultural and Globalised World Eng
After World War II, states transformed into ‘collective fortresses’ in order to protect competing ideological systems. The debate on post-modern statehood heavily built on ideological disputes between liberalism and communism, over the nature of the econo
- PDF / 7,124,851 Bytes
- 687 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 14 Downloads / 533 Views
Thomas Fleiner • Lidija R. Basta Fleiner
Constitutional Democracy in a Multicultural and Globalised World English translation from the German 3rd revised edition “Allgemeine Staatslehre” by Katy Le Roy
123
Professor Dr. Thomas Fleiner Professor Dr. Lidija R. Basta Fleiner Route de Beaumont 9 CH-1700 Fribourg www.thomasfleiner.ch [email protected] [email protected]
ISBN 978-3-540-76411-3
e-ISBN 978-3-540-76412-0
DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-76412-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2008938063 © 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. Cover design: WMX Design GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany Printed on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com
For our children Claudio, Michael, Andrea, Daniela and Jelena
Preface After World War II, states transformed into ‘collective fortresses’ in order to protect competing ideological systems. The debate on post-modern statehood heavily built on ideological disputes between liberalism and communism, over the nature of the economic and social system, and the state and government that could sustain such a system. What is an ‘ideologically acceptable’ state-concept; which tasks and functions should the state fulfil, and how to legitimate not only democratic, but also authoritarian and even totalitarian regimes? These questions were at the very centre of state theory. However, after the fall of communism in Europe and the former Soviet Union, the discourse of state and government scholarship radically changed. The need for a profound shift in the state paradigm was emerging. The time after 1989 seemed to proclaim that the nation-state had lost its raison d’être as an island of undisputed and unlimited sovereignty. A globalised world order broke open the ‘fortress state’ that developed within the tradition of European constitutionalism. Given the simultaneous structural changes to the nation-state’s foundations, socio-economic and political reforms going hand in hand with new constitutional designs, the ‘state in transition’ started paving the way towards a new state paradigm, and not only with regard to the states in the process of democratic transformation from socialist into liberal constitutional democracies. With universally valid fundamental human rights be
Data Loading...
