Correction to: Diagnostic impact of ascites cytology in 941 patients: malignancy rates and time of detection in ovarian
- PDF / 342,937 Bytes
- 1 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 98 Downloads / 137 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Diagnostic impact of ascites cytology in 941 patients: malignancy rates and time of detection in ovarian cancer relative to other tumor types Jens Krugmann1 · Corinna Lang Schwarz1 · Balint Melcher1 · William Sterlacci1 · Michael Vieth1 · Sophia Rösch2 · Johannes Lermann3
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020
Correction to: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2020) 301:1521–1532 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05553-y
Unfortunately we did not explain the type of sample collection in “materials and methods” more exactly. The samples includes intraoperative peritoneal washing cytology and cytologies from ascites punctures. In our study we included 941 patients. Intraoperative peritoneal washing samples were obtained in 124 of 203 ovarian carcinomas, in 2 of 2 fallopian tube carcinomas and in 4 of 15 endometrium carcinomas. Ascites puncture were performed in the other
811 patients. For the sake of simplicity we named all of the samples ascites. May be the terminus liquid intraabdominal cytology describes it better. It could be a limitation of our study. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00404-020-05553-y. * Jens Krugmann jens.krugmann@klinikum‑bayreuth.de 1
Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Preuschwitzer Strasse 101, 95445 Bayreuth, Germany
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
Data Loading...
