Correction to: Drying microclimates threaten persistence of natural and translocated populations of threatened frogs

  • PDF / 456,709 Bytes
  • 2 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 42 Downloads / 147 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)

CORRECTION

Correction to: Drying microclimates threaten persistence of natural and translocated populations of threatened frogs Emily P. Hoffmann1 Nicola J. Mitchell1



Kim Williams2 • Matthew R. Hipsey3



Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Correction to: Biodiversity and Conservation https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02064-9 In the original publication of the article, Figure 1 was published incorrectly. The correct Fig. 1 is given below. The original article has been corrected.

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02064-9. & Emily P. Hoffmann [email protected] 1

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

2

Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions, Parks and Wildlife Service, Bunbury, WA, Australia

3

School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

123

Biodiversity and Conservation

Fig. 1 Map of a the study area in southwest Western Australia b showing present (circles), extinct (crosses) and translocated (triangles) Geocrinia alba (black) and Geocrinia vitellina (orange) populations and sites sampled in this study (white symbols), c an example of the sampling design along drainage lines, showing sampled present site where frogs occur (circle), an immediately adjacent site (square) where frogs are absent, and a nearby extinct site (cross), and d an example of sampling quadrats at a site. Population locations and hydrology layers provided by Western Australian Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

123