Correction to: Harmonising, improving and using social and recreational data in National Forest Inventories across Europ

  • PDF / 148,495 Bytes
  • 1 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 48 Downloads / 188 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


CORRECTION

Correction to: Harmonising, improving and using social and recreational data in National Forest Inventories across Europe Mark A. Atkinson 1 & David M. Edwards 1 & Frank Søndergaard Jensen 2 & Alexander P. N. van der Jagt 1,3 & Ben R. Ditchburn 4 & Tuija Sievänen 5 & Patrizia Gasparini 6

# INRAE and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2020

“The NFI responsible institutions in the 44 signatory countries of Forest Europe with the presence of variables across a range of categories, we investigated the use of social and recreational data in official NFI analysis and reporting, and the historical context in which decisions to include these data in NFI surveys forest cover were contacted for information during March–June 2017.”

Correction to: Annals of Forest Science (2020) 77:76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00952-2 This correction stands to correct the listed errors in the original article: 1. For the following paragraph found in the Introduction: “As well as determining had been taken in addition to any impact such decisions have had on policy and management. We analysed differences across the NFIs in implementing the social variables.” The authors request this be changed and noted as: “We also investigated how decisions to include these data in NFI surveys had been taken and any impact such decisions have had on policy and management.” 2. In the first paragraph found in section 2 Materials and methods:

The authors request this be changed and noted as: “The institutions responsible for NFIs in the 44 signatory countries of Forest Europe with forest cover were contacted for information during March–June 2017.” 3. For the reference: “Fisher and Fischer and Brändli 2017” The authors request this be noted as: “Fischer and Brändli 2017”

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13595-020-00952-2 * Mark A. Atkinson [email protected] 1

Social and Economic Research Group, Forest Research, Farnham, UK

2

Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

3

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, UtrechtUniversity, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands

4

Inventory, Forecasting and Operational Support, Forest Research, Edinburgh, UK

5

Bio-economy and Environment, Natural Resources Institute Finland(Luke), Helsinki, Finland

6

Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economiaagraria–Centro di Ricerca Foreste e Legno (CREA-Research Centrefor Forestry and Wood), P.zza Nicolini, 38123 Trento, Italy