Correction to: Response to comments on: Perinatal exposure to a glyphosate-based herbicide impairs female reproductive o

  • PDF / 637,078 Bytes
  • 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 86 Downloads / 180 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


CORRECTION

Correction to: Response to comments on: Perinatal exposure to a glyphosate‑based herbicide impairs female reproductive outcomes and induces second‑generation adverse effects in Wistar rats María M. Milesi1   · Virginia Lorenz1 · Pablo M. Beldomenico2 · Stella Vaira3 · Jorgelina Varayoud1 · Enrique H. Luque1

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Correction to: Archives of Toxicology (2019) 93:3635–3638 https​://doi.org/10.1007/s0020​4-019-02609​-0

We report a mistake in the tables published in the original article. In Tables 1 and 2, the random effects mentioned were inaccurate, as they were different from those used for data analysis. We regret this error and the misinterpretations it may have caused, such as the comment by Plewis (2020), where he makes the point that the hierarchical structure of the data should be accounted for. It is noteworthy that our revised analysis (in the original article) was conducted with random intercepts, which were nested where appropriate, to take into account the hierarchical structure of our data, in which observations from some animals were not independent because they shared parents or grandparents. Tables 1 and 2 should be as follows:

Table 1  LMMs describing factors associated with the pre-implantation loss rate in control and GBH-exposed F1 female rats Term

Coefficients Standard error p value

Model = Pre-implantation losses ~ treatment + random effect = ID dam F0  Intercept 0.07000 0.01952 0.000688***  Treatment (GBH-LD) 0.05533 0.03491 0.118406  Treatment (GBH-HD) 0.09000 0.03671 0.017255* Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared to the control group, as *p