Distribution modeling of Amblyomma rotundatum and Amblyomma dissimile in Brazil: estimates of environmental suitability

  • PDF / 2,365,928 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 31 Downloads / 152 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ARTHROPODS AND MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER

Distribution modeling of Amblyomma rotundatum and Amblyomma dissimile in Brazil: estimates of environmental suitability Gina Polo 1,2 & Hermes R. Luz 3 & André Luis Regolin 4,5 & Thiago F. Martins 1 & Gisele R. Winck 6 Hélio R. da Silva 7 & Valeria C. Onofrio 8,9 & Marcelo B. Labruna 1 & João L. H. Faccini 10

&

Received: 13 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 October 2020 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract The number of reports of tick parasitism in amphibians and reptiles has increased over the past few years, including new host and location records for Amblyomma rotundatum and Amblyomma dissimile. However, knowledge of the geographical distribution remains incomplete, and in many regions of Brazil, the presence of these vectors has not been investigated. Several candidate models were built using a correlative maximum entropy approach, and best-fitting models were selected based on statistical significance, predictive ability, and complexity based on current climatic trends and future projected climate changes. Final models showed a good ability to discriminate A. rotundatum and A. dissimile current and future potential distributions. The entire country had higher predicted suitability for A. rotundatum while A. dissimile was mainly restricted to the Amazon and Pantanal biomes. A. rotundatum is a species with enormous potential for dissemination in the next decades, potentially through the legal and illegal transport of reptiles and amphibians. The proposed model is useful for targeting surveillance efforts increasing the efficiency and accuracy of future ecological research and tick management efforts. Keywords Amphibians . Reptiles . Ticks . Climate change . Species distribution modeling

Section Editor: Neil Bruce Chilton Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06924-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * Gina Polo [email protected] 1

Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Heath, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

2

Grupo de Investigación en Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia

3

Programa de Pós Graduação em Biotecnologia do Renorbio, Ponto Focal Maranhão, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, MA, Brazil

4

Department of Biodiversity, Spatial Ecology and Conservation Lab (LEEC), Institute of Biosciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Campus Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil

5

Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

6

Department of Ecology, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

7

Department of Animal Biology, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

8

Special Laboratory of Zoological Collections, Butantan Institute, São Paulo, Brazil

9

Master’s Program in Veterinary Medicine