Empirical Validity of a Generic, Preference-Based Capability Wellbeing Instrument (ICECAP-A) in the Context of Spinal Co
- PDF / 981,411 Bytes
- 18 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 10 Downloads / 193 Views
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Empirical Validity of a Generic, Preference‑Based Capability Wellbeing Instrument (ICECAP‑A) in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury Cassandra Mah1,2 · Vanessa K. Noonan3,4 · Stirling Bryan2,5 · David G. T. Whitehurst1,2,6
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
Abstract Background Assessing the validity of generic instruments across different clinical contexts is an important area of methodological research in economic evaluation and outcomes measurement. Objective Our objective was to examine the empirical validity of a generic, preference-based capability wellbeing instrument (ICECAP-A) in the context of spinal cord injury. Methods This study consisted of a secondary analysis of data collected using an online cross-sectional survey. The survey included questions regarding demographics, injury classifications and characteristics, secondary health conditions, quality of life and wellbeing, and functioning in activities of daily living. Analysis comprised the descriptive assessment of Spearman’s rank correlations between item-/dimension-level data for the ICECAP-A and four preference-based health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and discriminant and convergent validity approaches to examine 21 evidence-informed or theoretically derived constructs. Constructs were defined using participant and injury characteristics and responses to a range of health, wellbeing and functioning outcomes. Results Three hundred sixty-four individuals completed the survey. Mean index score for the ICECAP-A was 0.761; 12 (3%) individuals reported full capability (upper anchor; score = 1), and there were no reports of zero capabilities (lower anchor; score = 0). The strongest correlations were dominated by items and dimensions on the comparator (HRQoL) instruments that are non-health aspects of quality of life, such as happiness and control over one’s life (including self-care). Of 21 hypothesised constructs, 19 were confirmed in statistical tests, the exceptions being the exploratory hypotheses regarding education and age at injury. Conclusion The ICECAP-A is an empirically valid outcome measure for assessing capability wellbeing in people with spinal cord injury living in a community setting. The extent to which the ICECAP-A provides complementary information to preference-based HRQoL instruments is dependent on the comparator. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00451-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * David G. T. Whitehurst [email protected] 1
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
2
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
3
Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
4
Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
5
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
6
International Collab
Data Loading...
