Factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptability in the US

  • PDF / 190,180 Bytes
  • 1 Pages / 595.245 x 841.846 pts (A4) Page_size
  • 29 Downloads / 180 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


1

Factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptability in the US Vaccine-related attributes and political characteristics are influential factors in the self-reported likelihood of selecting and receiving a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine in adult patients in the US, according to a JAMA Network Open article. 1 The authors undertook a choice-based conjoint analysis via an online survey conducted on 9 July 2020 to assess participant’s self-reported likelihood of selecting and receiving a hypothetical vaccine based on seven attributes: efficacy; duration of protection; major adverse events; minor adverse events; US FDA approval process; country of origin; and political endorsement. Respondents had five choice tasks which each involved evaluating two hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines and selecting one, or neither, with levels of vaccine attributes randomly assigned, and attribute order randomised across participants. If a discrete choice was made between the two vaccine options, a 7-point Likert scale was used to ask how likely the participant was to receive that hypothetical vaccine. Across all choice sets in the 1971 individuals who completed the full questionnaire, 79% of the 9855 cases resulted in selection of one of the two hypothetical vaccines presented, with neither vaccine selected in 21% of cases. The most important vaccine attribute for selection was increased efficacy, followed by a longer duration of protection and a significantly lower incidence of major adverse events. Participants were less likely to select a vaccine developed outside of the US, particularly from China, or a vaccine approved via FDA emergency use authorisation (EUA) rather than full FDA approval. Endorsement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and WHO were associated with higher probabilities of vaccine selection compared with an endorsement by President Trump. Similar results were observed for individual’s willingness to receive a hypothetical vaccine, which increased with better vaccine efficacy, reduction in major adverse events, US versus China origin, and endorsement by CDC/WHO versus President Trump. The authors concluded that "[t]hese results may help inform public health campaigns to address vaccine hesitancy when a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available". In an invited commentary, Dr Douglas Opel et al noted that the study "lands at a critical moment for US public health" as vaccine delivery seems imminent though the US government’s Operation Warp Speed initiative to produce and deliver a COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021.2 Findings on the influence of vaccine efficacy and safety on public acceptability were not unexpected, with the effect on self-reported uptake of the authorisation process and endorsements in line with previous studies of vaccine uptake during the 2009 H1N1A influenza pandemic. However, the commentary noted that the reduced probability of acceptance for a vaccine made available under the FDA EUA versus full FDA approval process was of particular interest, commenting that this "is extremely pertinent