Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement

  • PDF / 1,427,778 Bytes
  • 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 9 Downloads / 221 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Functional and ecosystem service differences between tree species: implications for tree species replacement R. J. Mitchell1   · R. L. Hewison1 · R. K. Haghi1   · A. H. J. Robertson1 · A. M. Main1 · I. J. Owen1 Received: 24 April 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Key message  Tree species differ in their functioning at the scale of an individual tree which will result in differences in ecosystem service provision. Replacement trees for diseased trees should take account of functional differences. Abstract  Globally tree species composition is changing due to species loss from pests and pathogens. The impact of this change on ecological functioning is rarely tested. Using six sites across the UK, with multiple tree species at each site, we test for functional differences between three species threatened by disease in the UK: Quercus petraea, Q. robur and Fraxinus excelsior and six other species: Acer pseudoplatanus, Castanea sativa, Fagus sylvatica, Quercus cerris, Quercus rubra, and Tilia x europaea, which have previously been suggested as ecological replacements. Differences between species were detected for all the variables measured: nitrogen mineralization, decomposition rate, total soil carbon and nitrogen, soil pH, soil temperature, and bark water holding capacity. Non-native Quercus species were only suitable replacements for native Quercus for some of the functions measured but replicating native Quercus functioning using a mixture of other species may be possible. The functioning of F. excelsior was different from most other tree species, suggesting that replicating its functioning with replacement tree species is difficult. The work highlighted that which species replaces diseased trees, even at the scale of single trees, will impact on the functions and ecosystem services provided. Keywords  Carbon sequestration · Ecosystem services · Ecological functions · Nutrient cycling · Temperature regulation · Tree diseases

Introduction Trees are ‘foundation’ species (Boyd et al. 2013; Ellison 2005); individuals that define much of the structure of a community by creating locally stable conditions for other species, and by modulating and stabilizing fundamental ecosystem processes (Ellison 2005). As foundation species, trees influence many ecosystem functions such as primary production, soil formation, and nutrient cycling, and provide ecosystem services such as fibre, energy, carbon Communicated by Han. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (https​://doi.org/10.1007/s0046​8-020-02035​-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. * R. J. Mitchell [email protected] 1



The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK

sequestration, and climate regulation (Boyd et al. 2013; UK NEA 2011). When forests of different tree species are compared, differences in their functioning can be detected. Forests, or areas within forests, dominated by d