Haecceity An Ontological Essay
Many contemporary philosophers are interested in the scotistic notion of haecceity or `thisness' because it is relevant to important problems concerning identity and individuation, reference, modality, and propositional attitudes. Haecceity is the only bo
- PDF / 24,124,533 Bytes
- 269 Pages / 430.866 x 649.134 pts Page_size
- 82 Downloads / 290 Views
		    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES SERIES Founded by Wilfrid S. Sellars and Keith Lehrer
 
 Editor: KEITH LEHRER, University of Arizona
 
 Board of Consulting Editors: JONATHAN BENNETT, Syracuse University ALLAN GIBBARD, University of Michigan ROBERT STALNAKER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ROBERT G. TURNBULL, Ohio State University
 
 VOLUME 57
 
 GARYS. ROSENKRANTZ University of North Carolina at Greensboro
 
 HAECCEITY An Ontological Essay
 
 SPRINGER-SCIENCE+BUSINESS MEDIA, B.V.
 
 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rosenkrantz. Gary S. Haecceity an ontological essay I by Gary S. Rosenkrantz. p. cm. -- (Philosophical studies seri'es ; v. 57> Includes bibliographical references (p. xxx-xxx) and indexes. ISBN 978-90-481-4311-5 ISBN 978-94-015-8175-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-8175-2 1. Title. II. Series. 1. Haecceity (Philosophy)
 
 BD395.5.R67 111--dc20
 
 1993
 
 93-27789
 
 ISBN 978-90-481-4311-5
 
 Printed an acid-free paper
 
 AH Rights Reserved © 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Origina11y published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1993 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover lst edition 1993
 
 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner-
 
 For my parents, Gerald and Hannah, with gratitude and love: without them my individual nature would be unconceived, unexpressed, and unexemplified.
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 PREFACE CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTORY PRELIMINAIRES
 
 I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX
 
 Haecceity: An Initial Account Qualitative and Nonqualitative Abstracta Controversies About Haecceities Modal Concepts Cognitive and Linguistic Concepts Haecceities and Individual Essences Varieties of Realism and Anti-Realism The Concrete/Abstract Distinction Qualitative and Nonqualitative Properties
 
 CHAPTER 2- THE PROBLEM OF INDIVIDUATION
 
 I Metaphysical Explanations II Qualitatively Indistinguishable Concreta III Proposed Criteria of Individuation IV Principles of Evaluation for the Proposed Criteria V Evaluations of the Proposed Criteria VI The Haecceity Criterion: Neither Trivial Nor Circular VII Responses To A Priori Objections to Haecceity VIII Haecceity: A Metaphysical Explanation of Diversity CHAPTER 3 -HAECCEITIES AND NONEXISTENT POSSIBLE INDIVIDUALS
 
 I II III IV
 
 The Individuation of NEPs The Individuation of Disjoint Objects Objections To Unexemplified Haecceities: A Reply The Unity of Metaphysical Modalities
 
 CHAPTER 4- SINGULAR REFERENCE AND UNEXEMPLIFIED HAECCEITIES
 
 I Mereological Descriptions ofUnexemplified Haecceities II Causal Descriptions of Unexemplified Haecceities
 
 IX
 
 1 1 6 11 16 22 42 53 56 69 72 72 77 82 93 97 106 124 130 140 140 146 150 166 168 168 179
 
 viii
 
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 I Haecceities and Acquaintance II Haecceities and Re-identification III An Argument for Premise 1 of R IV An Argument for Premise 2 of R V Synchronic Versions of R VI Objections toR and its Anal		
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	