In vitro performance of six combinations of adjustable differential pressure valves and fixed anti-siphon devices with a
- PDF / 1,503,167 Bytes
- 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 84 Downloads / 127 Views
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - CSF CIRCULATION
In vitro performance of six combinations of adjustable differential pressure valves and fixed anti-siphon devices with and without vertical motion I. Fiss 1,2 & P. Röhrig 1 & N. Hore 3 & C. von der Brelie 1 & C. Bettag 1 & F. B. Freimann 1 & U.-W. Thomale 4 & V. Rohde 1 & S. Brandner 3 Received: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 30 July 2020 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Objective Adjustable differential pressure (DP) valves in combination with fixed anti-siphon devices are currently a popular combination in counteracting the effects of cerebrospinal fluid overdrainage following implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt system. The study examined the flow performance of three DP valves in successive combination with an anti-siphon device in an in vitro shunt laboratory with and without vertical motion. Methods We analyzed three DP valves (Codman Hakim Medos programmable valve [HM], Codman CertasPlus [CP], and Miethke proGAV [PG], in combination with either Codman SiphonGuard [SG] or Miethke ShuntAssistant [SA]), resulting in the evaluation of six different valve combinations. Defined DP conditions between 4 and 40 cm H2O within a simulated shunt system were generated and the specific flow characteristics were measured. In addition, combinations with SA, which is a gravitydependent valve, were measured in defined spatial positions (90°, 60°). All device combinations were tested during vertical motion with movement frequencies of 2, 3, and 4 Hz. Results All valve combinations effectively counteracted the siphon effect in relation to the chosen DP. Angulation-related flow changes were similar in the three combinations of DP valve and SA in the 60° and 90° position. In CP-SA and PG-SA, repeated vertical movement at 2, 3, and 4 Hz led to significant increase in flow, whereas in HM-SA, constant increase was seen at 4 Hz only (flow change at 4Hz, DP 40 cm H2O: PG (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) 90°: 0.95 ml/min, 60°: 0.71 ml/min; HM (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) 90°: 0.66 ml/min, 60°: 0.41 ml/min; CP (PL 2) 90°: 0.94 ml/min, 60°: 0.79 ml/min; p < 0.01); however, HMSA showed relevant motion-induced flow already at low DPs (0.85 ml/min, DP 4 cm H2O). In combinations of DP valve with SG, increase of flow was far less pronounced and even led to significant reduction of flow in certain constellations. Maximum overall flow increase was 0.46 ± 0.04 ml/min with a HM (opening pressure 12 cm H2O) at 2 Hz and a DP of 10 cm H2O, whereas maximum flow decrease was 1.12 ± 0.08 with a PG (opening pressure 4 cm H2O) at 3 Hz and a DP of 10 cmH2O. Conclusion In an experimental setup, all valve combinations effectively counteracted the siphon effect in the vertical position according to their added resistance. Motion-induced increased flow was consistently demonstrated in combinations of DP valve and SA. The combination of HM and SA especially showed relevant motion-induced flow already at low DPs. In combinations of DP and SG, the pattern of the motion induced flow was more i
Data Loading...
