Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) training in a metropolitan university hospital: short-term experience with MAss Casualty SI

  • PDF / 1,296,823 Bytes
  • 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 18 Downloads / 156 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) training in a metropolitan university hospital: short‑term experience with MAss Casualty SIMulation system ­MACSIM® Laura Castoldi1 · Massimiliano Greco2 · Michele Carlucci3 · Kristina Lennquist Montán4 · Roberto Faccincani3 Received: 14 April 2020 / Accepted: 31 October 2020 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Aim  The aim of this study was to test and validate a new hospital Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) training using ­MACSIM® (MAss Casualty SIMulation) system adapted to the specifications and MCI plan of a single hospital. Methods  The original MCI training format called MACSIM-PEMAF (Piano di Emergenza per il Massiccio Afflusso di Feriti, i.e., hospital disaster plan for massive influx of casualties) was developed for the Italian Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (SICUT) in 2016. It uses ­MACSIM®, a simulation tool for the training and assessment of healthcare professionals in MCI management. Between 2016 and 2018 the course was held several times at a university hospital in the Milan metropolitan area. The ­MACSIM® tool was used to reproduce different MCI scenarios with actual hospital resources. During the simulations, participants acted in their usual professional functions, testing both the local MCI plan as well as the individuals’ knowledge and skills. Course effectiveness was validated by a pre- and post-curse self-assessment questionnaire. Results  MACSIM-PEMAF was tested over 7 courses, with a total of 258 participants. Pre- and post-course questionnaires showed a significant improvement for hospital staff in self-reported perceptions of knowledge and skills in MCI management. In total, on a 1–10 scale, all the staff increased their competencies from a value of 4.4 ± 2.5 to 7.5 ± 1.9 (p