Novel & worthy: creativity as a thick epistemic concept
- PDF / 505,269 Bytes
- 23 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
- 114 Downloads / 225 Views
(2020) 10:40
PAPER IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE IN PRACTICE
Open Access
Novel & worthy: creativity as a thick epistemic concept Julia Sánchez-Dorado 1 Received: 28 November 2019 / Accepted: 5 August 2020/ # The Author(s) 2020
Abstract The standard view in current philosophy of creativity says that being creative has two requirements: being novel and being valuable (to which a third intentionality requirement is often added; Sternberg and Lubart 1999; Boden 2004; Gaut 2010). The standard view on creativity has recently become an object of critical scrutiny. Hills and Bird (2018) have specifically proposed to remove the value requirement from the definition, as it is not clear that creative objects are necessarily valuable or creative people necessarily praiseworthy. In this paper, I argue against Hills and Bird (2018), since eliminating the element of value from the explanation of creativity hinders the understanding of the role that creative products play in actual epistemic practices, which are fundamentally normative. More specifically, I argue that the terms ‘creativity’ and ‘creative’ function as thick epistemic concepts when employed by competent epistemic agents in practice, that is, these concepts have both a descriptive and an evaluative content that cannot be disentangled from one another. Accordingly, I suggest that philosophers should prefer thick accounts over thin accounts of creativity. A thick account of creativity is one that endorses the standard view at its basis, but further develops it in two ways: by stressing the entanglement of the value and novelty requirements; by permitting to encompass a range of domain-specific characterizations of such entanglement for different epistemic situations. In order to take the first steps in the development of such a thick account of creativity, I look at the domain of scientific practices as a case in point, and try to spell out what the thickness (or entanglement of novelty and worth) of creative instances typically entails here. Namely, I identify the worthy novelty of creative models and methods with their potential to clarify a tradition, with fruitfulness, and with the fulfilment of exploratory aims.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Creativity in Art, Science & Mind Guest Editors: Adrian Currie, Anton Killin
* Julia Sánchez-Dorado [email protected]
1
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany
40
Page 2 of 23
European Journal for Philosophy of Science
(2020) 10:40
Keywords Creativity . Thick concepts . Epistemic values . Novelty . Exploration .
Fruitfulness
1 Introduction One of the most widely adopted definitions of creativity in contemporary philosophical debates says that creativity is the ability to produce novel and valuable objects (Boden 2004: 1; Sternberg and Lubart 1999), to which an element of intentionality or agency is often added (Kieran 2014; Stokes 2008; Gaut 2012). Also known as the standard view on creativity, this definition appears to capture what is crucial about creativity w
Data Loading...
