Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition

  • PDF / 977,802 Bytes
  • 13 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 89 Downloads / 196 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pointing movements and visuo‑spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition Divya Bhatia1 · Pietro Spataro2 · Ramesh Kumar Mishra3 · Vincenzo Cestari1 · Fabrizio Doricchi1,4 · Clelia Rossi‑Arnaud1  Received: 20 July 2018 / Accepted: 4 June 2019 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Abstract Previous studies have shown that, under specific conditions, arrays that have been pointed at encoding are recognized better than passively viewed ones. According to one interpretation, the superior recognition of pointed-to arrays can be explained by the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays. The present study sought to determine whether a similar motor inhibition can be induced also when the participants observed a co-actor perform the pointing movements. Participants were presented with two spatial arrays, one of which was encoded via observation only (the no-move array), while the other was encoded with pointing movements (the move array); movements were performed either by the participant or by the experimenter. Experiment 1 replicated the advantage of self-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays. Experiment 2 showed that, when participants passively observed the pointing movements performed by the experimenter, move arrays were recognized no better than no-move arrays. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that, in a joint-action condition in which participants alternated with the experimenter in making pointing movements, the advantage of experimenter-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays was significant and similar in size to the advantage produced by self-performed movements. Importantly, a series of cross-experiment comparisons indicated that the higher recognition of both self- and experimenter-pointed arrays in Experiment 3 could be explained by the motor inhibition of no-move arrays. We propose that, in a joint condition, the pointing movements performed by the experimenter were represented in the same functional way as self-performed movements and that this produced the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays.

Introduction When encoding or recalling a spatial array, being asked to simultaneously perform movements that are unrelated to the to-be-remembered items is generally detrimental for performance (see Quinn, 2008, for a review). These data are well accounted for in the Visuo-Spatial Working Memory model proposed by Logie (1995), a later version of the working memory model originally formulated by Baddeley and Hitch

* Clelia Rossi‑Arnaud clelia.rossi‑[email protected] 1



Department of Psychology, Sapienza University, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy

2



Department of Economy, Universitas Mercatorum, Rome, Italy

3

Center for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India

4

Fondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Rome, Italy



(1974). In Logie’s account (1995), VSWM can be divided into a passive visual store (called the visual cache) and a movement-based spatial store (called the inner scribe) ass