Political Stability and Multi-level Governance in the Arctic
This chapter examines the interplay between regional institutions for governing the Arctic and broader institutions applicable there and elsewhere. Despite rapid environmental change in the Arctic, political stability remains high. One reason is that Arct
- PDF / 209,109 Bytes
- 15 Pages / 439.37 x 666.14 pts Page_size
- 26 Downloads / 229 Views
Political Stability and Multi-level Governance in the Arctic Olav Schram Stokke
Abstract This chapter examines the interplay between regional institutions for governing the Arctic and broader institutions applicable there and elsewhere. Despite rapid environmental change in the Arctic, political stability remains high. One reason is that Arctic states have relatively few unsettled maritime boundary issues and manage the remaining ones in a cooperative manner. Another reason is that an international legal framework exists for governing economic use of the region. The framework is based on global, customary international law codified in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, http://www.un.org/ Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm.) and obliges states to respond individually and jointly to the new challenges deriving from increasing economic activities. The chapter then examines the adequacy of regional means for strengthening the Arctic governance system, and finds that regional institutions like the Arctic Council have only partial roles to play – the Arctic Ocean needs multilevel governance. The fact that Arctic environmental challenges cannot be addressed without significant contributions from broader or global institutions raises the question of how the Arctic Council should deal with certain non-Arctic states wishing to participate in Council work. Important governance functions like generating knowledge on environmental risks and response options, obtaining Arctic-sensitive regulations in broader international fora, and mobilizing resources and legal competence to support rule implementation stand to benefit from greater involvement of other interested states. Providing effective and legitimate governance is the best basis for ensuring political stability in the Arctic.
O.S. Stokke (*) Research Professor, Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, Lysaker 1366, Norway e-mail: [email protected]
297 P.A. Berkman and A.N. Vylegzhanin (eds.), Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4713-5_26, © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
298
26.1
O.S. Stokke
Introduction
Is the present institutional framework for Arctic governance adequate for avoiding conflict over resource use and other economic activities? What is the appropriate division of labour between regional and global components of this framework? And how can a regional institution like the Arctic Council maximize its contribution to effective and legitimate governance in the Arctic? I argue in this chapter that conditions for adaptive and peaceful management of activities in this region are favourable because a dynamic governance framework is already in place and inter-state jurisdictional rivalry is modest. Globally applicable regimes like those based on the Law of the Sea Convention weigh the most in Arctic governance, but regional institutions too can play important roles in strengthening
Data Loading...
