Agroforestry systems: an alternative to intensify forage-based livestock in the Brazilian Amazon
- PDF / 495,921 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
- 21 Downloads / 173 Views
(0123456789().,-volV) ( 01234567 89().,-volV)
Agroforestry systems: an alternative to intensify forage-based livestock in the Brazilian Amazon Leandro F. Domiciano . Bruno C. Pedreira . Na´gela M. F. da Silva . Mirce´ia A. Mombach . Fernanda H. M. Chizzotti . Erick D. Batista . Perivaldo Carvalho . Luciano S. Cabral . Dalton H. Pereira . Hemython L. B. do Nascimento
Received: 12 November 2019 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 Ó Springer Nature B.V. 2020
Abstract Brazil is one of the few countries in the world that can produce animal products, grains, fibers, and bioenergy in the same area, either in a consortium, rotation, or succession. Our objective was to compare pasture productivity and animal performance in agroforestry systems with grass monoculture in the Brazilian Amazon Biome. The experiment was carried out in Sinop, MT, Brazil, with Nellore steers in a continuous stocking with variable stocking rate. The experimental design was a randomized complete block, with four systems and four replicates. The palisadegrass [Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A.
L. F. Domiciano M. A. Mombach P. Carvalho L. S. Cabral Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiaba´, MT 78060-900, Brazil B. C. Pedreira (&) Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril, PO Box 343, Sinop, MT 78550-970, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] N. M. F. da Silva D. H. Pereira Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Sinop, MT 78557-267, Brazil F. H. M. Chizzotti H. L. B. do Nascimento Universidade Federal de Vic¸osa, Vic¸osa, MG 36570-900, Brazil E. D. Batista Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG 37200-000, Brazil
Rich.) R. D. Webster cv. Marandu] was planted in the four systems: livestock (grass monoculture); livestock–forestry [eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis; hybrid of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake) arranged in three-row groves spaced 30 m apart]; crop–livestock (palisadegrass after two years of crops); and crop– livestock–forestry (palisadegrass after two years of crops with single rows of eucalyptus trees spaced 37 m apart). The herbage accumulation was greater in the systems with the two previous cropping years (crop– livestock and crop–livestock–forestry) than in the livestock and livestock–forestry, in both seasons. In the crop–livestock–forestry, the greatest herbage accumulation associated with the modified microclimate supported the greatest average daily gain (0.750 kg BW day- 1), stocking rate in both seasons, resulting in the greatest gain per area (940 kg BW ha- 1). We conclude that agroforestry systems assure pasture productivity and animal performance similar or greater than livestock (grass monoculture). Furthermore, the combination of two previous crop years and the least tree density optimized the synergy between crop, livestock, and forestry components, improving beef cattle productivity in crop–livestock–forestry systems. Keywords Beef cattle Brachiaria brizantha Crop–livestock Integrated systems Silvopastoral
123
Agroforest Syst
Introduction The agricultural sector is sti
Data Loading...
