Correction to: Characterization and potential application of gleysols and ferralsols for ceramic industry: a case study
- PDF / 2,584,156 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 24 Downloads / 208 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Characterization and potential application of gleysols and ferralsols for ceramic industry: a case study from Dimako (Eastern Cameroon) Josti M. Doum 1 & Gentry C. Fuh 1 & Soureiyatou Fadil-Djenabou 2 & Vincent Laurent Onana 1 & Paul-Désiré Ndjigui 1 & John S. Armstrong-Altrin 3
# Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020
Correction to: Arabian Journal of Geosciences (2020) 13:1074 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06007-0 The original version of this paper was published with error. Figure captions were incorrectly assigned to its corresponding images. Given in this article are the correct figures and captions. The original article has been corrected.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12517-020-06007-0 * Paul-Désiré Ndjigui [email protected] 1
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. Box 812, Yaoundé, Cameroon
2
Department of Life and Earth Sciences, Higher Teachers’ Training College, University of Maroua, P.O. Box 55, Maroua, Cameroon
3
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Unidad de Procesos Oceánicos y Costeros, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 Ciudad de México, Mexico
1161 Page 2 of 1
Arab J Geosci
(2020) 13:1161
Fig. 1 a) Location of Cameroon relative to African cratons. b) Geological map of Cameroon locating the study area (Toteu et al. 2001). c) Geological map of Dimako showing sampling location (Asaah et al. 2015)
Fig. 2 Typical profiles of gleysols (a) and ferralsols (b) at Dimako
a
b
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
1.54 Qz
75
DA7 DA6 DA5 DA4 DA3b DA3a DA2 DA1
5
15 4.25 Qz
25
85
35
Fig. 4 X-ray diffraction spectra of (a) Koba gleysols, (b) Dimako gleysols, and (c) Koba and Dimako ferralsols
45
55
1.82 Qz 65
65
75
1.37 Ant
55
1.54 Qz 1.48 Hem / Ant 1.46 Hem / Ant
45
1.37 Ant
1.54 Qz 1.48 Hem 1.45 Hem
1.67 Qz / Ant / Zrn
1.82 Qz
1.98 Qz / Gbs
2.13 Qz
2.28 Qz / Kln / Gbs 2.23 Qz
3.34 Qz
(2020) 13:1161
1.67 Qz / Gbs / Ant
35
1.98 Qz / Gbs
25
2.69 Hem 2.56 - 2.52 Kln / Hem / Zrn 2.34 Kln / Ant 2.46 Qz / Gbs
3.57 - 3.52 Kln / Ant
4.84 Gbs 4.45 Kln / Zrn 4.25 Qz
7.18 Kln
3.34 Qz
c
2.69 Hem / Gth 2.56 - 2.52 Kln / Hem / Zr 2.45 Qz / Gbs 2.34 Kln / Ant 2.28 Kln / Gbs 2.23 Qz 2.13 Qz
3.34 Qz
15
3.57 - 3.52 Kln / Ant
4.18 Gth / Kln
5
4.84 Gbs 4.45 Kln / Zrn
7.17 Kln
75
KA3b KA3a KA1b KA1a KA2 KA1 85
I n ten s ity (a .u .)
1.37 Ant
1.54 Qz
1.67 Qz / Ant / Zrn
1.82 Qz
1.98 Qz
2.52 Kln / Zrn 2.46 Qz 2.28 Qz / Kln 2.23 Qz 2.13 Qz
3.57 - 3.52 Kln / Ant
4.45 Kln / Zrn 4.25 Qz
7.15 Kln
I n t e n s i t y ( a . u .)
a
Intensity (a.u.)
1.37 Ant
65
1.46 Ant / Ilm
55
1.67 Qz / Gth / Ant
1.82 Qz
45
1.98 Qz
35
2.52 Kln / Zrn 2.46 Qz / Gth 2.28 Qz / Kln 2.23 Qz / Ilm 2.13 Qz
25
2.75 Ilm
b 3.34 Qz
15
3.57 - 3.52 Kln / Ant
5
4.45 Kln / Zrn 4,25 Qz 4.18 Gth / Kln
7.16 Kln
Intensity (a.u)
Arab J Geosci Page 3 of 1 1161
Fig. 3 Characterization of soil texture from Dimako using the ternary diagram
75 85
KL2
d
DL
Data Loading...
