Correction to: Is it still worth it? Applying expectancy-value theory to investigate the intraindividual motivational pr
- PDF / 355,681 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 89 Downloads / 212 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Is it still worth it? Applying expectancy‑value theory to investigate the intraindividual motivational process of forming intentions to drop out from university Theresa Schnettler1 · Julia Bobe2 · Anne Scheunemann1 · Stefan Fries1 · Carola Grunschel3 Published online: 8 September 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Correction to: Motivation and Emotion (2020) 44:491–507 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09822-w
The author would like to correct the errors in the publication of the original article. The corrected details are given below. (a) Page 498: “Out of the total sample (N = 326), n = 225” should be changed to: “Out of the total sample (N = 326), n = 224”. (b) Page 498: “and at least n = 49 students answered only at T1” should be corrected to: “and at least n = 48 students answered only at T1” (c) Page 498: “A one-way ANOVA revealed no significant mean differences between the initial sample at T1 and those who left the current study at T2 or T3 regarding dropout intention, F(2, 325) = .59, p = .56, expectancy, F(2, 325) = .71, p = .49, intrinsic value, F(2, 325) = .05, p = .95, attainment value F(2, 325) = 1.18, p = .31, utility value F(2, 325) = 2.98, p = .05, and study cost, F(2, 325) = .12, p = .89.” should be corrected to: “A oneway ANOVA revealed no significant mean differences between the initial sample at T1 and those who left the current study at T2 or T3 regarding dropout intention,
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11031-020-09822-w. * Theresa Schnettler theresa.schnettler@uni‑muenster.de 1
Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, P.O. Box 1001 31, Universitätsstraße 25, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
2
Psychology Department, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany
3
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
13
Vol:.(1234567890)
F(2, 323) = 0.62, p = .54, expectancy, F(2, 323) = 0.65, p = .52, intrinsic value, F(2, 323) = 0.14, p = .87, attainment value F(2, 323) = 0.51, p = .60, utility value F(2, 323) = 3.05, p = .05, and study cost, F(2, 323) = 0.66, p = .52.” (d) Page 498: There are minor errors in Table 1 regarding the reported descriptive mean values of dropout intention. The corrected values are given below. (e) Page 500: The minor errors in the reported descriptive mean values of dropout intention (d) affected also the intercorrelations between dropout intention and the time varying variables at all measurement times in Table 2. We conveniently present the corrected correlations in Table 2. (f) Page 501: The minor errors in the reported descriptive mean values of dropout intention (d) affected also the intercorrelations between dropout intention and the time invariant variables at all measurement times in Table 3. We conveniently present the corrected correlations in Table 3.
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of all variables at all measurement times Measure
Dropout intention
T1
T2
T3
M
SD
M
SD
M
SD
2.28
1.23
2.50
1.
Data Loading...
