Seismic vulnerability analysis of medieval rammed earth fortifications in southeastern Spain

  • PDF / 2,908,453 Bytes
  • 32 Pages / 439.37 x 666.142 pts Page_size
  • 20 Downloads / 148 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


Seismic vulnerability analysis of medieval rammed earth fortifications in southeastern Spain I. Arto1   · J. Garrido2   · M. L. Gutiérrez‑Carrillo3  Received: 21 October 2019 / Accepted: 18 July 2020 © Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Abstract This paper analyses the seismic vulnerability of various rammed earth medieval fortifications situated in Southeastern Spain, where seismic events with intensity over VII have taken place in the last millennium, using the vulnerability index method. This method begins with the choice of a certain initial value, V ­ 0, of the vulnerability index, which is  , and minimum, Vmin  , values, which obtained from a preset range between maximum, Vmax 0 0 are likely for vulnerability indices, according to the constructive material characteristics and based on expert judgments. Rammed earth structures have not yet been studied using the vulnerability index method, despite the fact that they are quite common medieval structures in Spain and other countries in the Mediterranean region, many of which are also heritage sites, and hence are legally protected. Intervention priorities on them have been determined from the results in this paper with the aim of reducing their seismic vulnerability. For the different rammed earth techniques, a proposed primary value V ­ p = 0.76 together with some other material modifiers (construction typology and quality, current material porosity and density, and superficial deterioration) make the range of values V ­ 0 vary between 0.58 and 1.02. Moreover, structural behavior modifiers (­MK) have been adapted to the various defensive rammed earth structural typologies used for these fortifications allowing us to obtain individualized vulnerability index values. Three rammed earth fortifications damaged by historical earthquakes and located in SE Spain have been used to validate the method, in which values of ­V0med range between 35.2 and 89.1% and upwards and the vulnerability index ­IVmed may vary between 27.9 and 70.7% and upwards as compared to those used by other authors for castles. Besides, the proposed method has been used by carefully choosing six rammed earth fortifications (two towers, two walls and two castles) in SE Spain which are representative of different construction systems, structural typologies and topographies. Furthermore, the mean damage grade and the probability of its occurrence is determined for each fortification based on PGA data and site effects, taking into account a probabilistic seismic scenario for a 975 year return period, in accordance with existing legislation. In the end, direct relations are established between the seismic vulnerability and the types of material and the typology of the fortifications. We have carried out a sensibility analysis in order to learn about the influence of the constructive technique, the material condition and the structural typology on the damage grade value. The results show that lime-crusted rammed earth technique and tower typologies are the most vulnerable structures while topography is somehow