Solvent extractions and spectrophotometric protocols for measuring the total anthocyanin, phenols and antioxidant conten
- PDF / 970,864 Bytes
- 12 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 12 Downloads / 171 Views
ORIGINAL PAPER
Solvent extractions and spectrophotometric protocols for measuring the total anthocyanin, phenols and antioxidant content in plums Joel Johnson1 · Tania Collins1 · Kerry Walsh1 · Mani Naiker1 Received: 16 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 June 2020 © Institute of Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences 2020
Abstract Total monomeric anthocyanins from six commercial plum varieties were extracted using two protocols, viz methanol/water extraction through end-over-end shaking and ethanol/water extraction in a shaking water bath; adapted from the Australian Wine Research Institute (AWRI) standard method. Anthocyanins were determined using the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) standard protocol and a modification of the AWRI method. The mean relative standard deviation was found to be similar between methods, at 13.5% and 9.9%, respectively. On average, the anthocyanin concentrations given by the AWRI method were 27% higher than those obtained using the AOAC standard method. This was attributed to the AWRI method not correcting for haze or matrix interference, but estimating the anthocyanin concentration from the absorbance at a single wavelength. Anthocyanin measurements on the two extractions using the same measurement protocol supported this, indicating that the methanolic extracts gave a higher anthocyanin yield than the ethanolic extracts. Furthermore, HPLC profiling of the anthocyanin content demonstrated significantly more anthocyanins were extracted through the methanol extraction protocol. The methanol/water extraction protocol and AOAC standard method are much simpler to perform than the AWRI method and appear to be at least as precise. Thus this extraction and spectrophotometric protocol is well suited to future work on plum matrices. The extraction method is also more suitable for the subsequent photometric and/or HPLC determination of phenolic and total antioxidant contents. Keywords Plums · pH-differential anthocyanin method · Cyanidin-3-glucoside · Methanolic extraction
Introduction Due to the well-publicised health and nutritional benefits of anthocyanins (Galvano et al. 2007), there is a growing interest in anthocyanin-rich foods and consumers (Prasain et al. 2018). Hence anthocyanin content is perceived as a crucial biochemical marker for quality in an increasing number of fruits, including plums (González-Flores et al. 2011; Fanning et al. 2014), strawberries (Felgines et al. 2003; da Silva et al. 2007), blueberries (Nicoue et al. 2007; You et al. 2011; Eliopoulos et al. 2016), and red grapes (Orak 2007; Figueiredo-González et al. 2012), amongst other fruits (Ferretti et al. 2010). Its popularity as an indicator for nutritionally valuable and medicinally beneficial attributes has been * Joel Johnson [email protected] 1
School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bruce Hwy, North Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia
utilised not only as a marketing tool by vendors, but breeders and commercial producers are beginning to use antho
Data Loading...
