Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized

  • PDF / 959,446 Bytes
  • 10 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 15 Downloads / 146 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


STUDY PROTOCOL

Open Access

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable trunk or limb pain: study protocol for a Chinese multicenter randomized withdrawal trial (CITRIP study) Yang Lu1,2†, Peng Mao3†, Guihuai Wang1†, Wei Tao4, Donglin Xiong5, Ke Ma6, Rongchun Li7, Dan Feng8, Wanru Duan9, Shun Li10, Zhijian Fu11, Zhiying Feng12, Yi Jin13, Li Wan14, Yan Lu15, Daying Zhang16, Bifa Fan3*, James Jin Wang1* and Luming Li2*

Abstract Background: Although effective results of many studies support the use of spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain patients, no randomized controlled trial has been undertaken in China to date. CITRIP is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, withdrawal study designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of spinal cord stimulation plus remote programming management in patients with intractable trunk or limb pain. Method: Participants will be recruited in approximately 10 centers across China. Eligible participants with intractable trunk or limb and an average visual analog scale (VAS) score ≥ 5 will undergo a spinal cord stimulation test. Participants with VAS score reduction ≥ 50% could move forward to receive implantation of an implanted pulse generator. In the withdrawal period at 3-month follow-up visit, participants randomized to the experimental group (EG) will undergo continuous stimulation while ceasing the stimulation in the control group (CG). The outcome assessment will occur at baseline and at 1, 3 (pre- and post-randomization), and 6 months. The primary outcome is the difference of maximal VAS score between EG and CG in the withdrawal period compared with baseline before the withdrawal period. Additional outcomes include VAS score change at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups; responder rate (VAS score improving by 50%); achievement rate of a desirable pain state (VAS score ≤ 4); awake times during sleep; Beck Depression Inventory for depression evaluation; short-form 36 for quality of life evaluation; drug usage; and satisfaction rating of the device. Adverse events will be collected. The primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. (Continued on next page)

* Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] † Yang Lu, Peng Mao and Guihuai Wang contributed equally to this work. 3 Department of Pain Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China 2 National Engineering Laboratory for Neuromodulation, School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence