Understanding and Controlling Transient Enhanced Dopant Diffusion in Silicon
- PDF / 857,964 Bytes
- 12 Pages / 414.72 x 648 pts Page_size
- 77 Downloads / 294 Views
		    extremely low levels ( in Fig. 9 show that the interstitial diffusion profile in sample SPE1 is significantly steeper than in the as-grown MBE sample, indicating a lower interstitial diffusivity. This suggests that the SPE-regrowth step following amorphization has raised the level of interstitial traps in the superlattice, for instance through the introduction of vacancy-type defects [4]. Figure 8(b) shows that the 1018 C/cm 3 in sample SPEI has redistributed under the injection of interstitials and has decorated the B-rich regions. This could indicate that C is gettered at the B clusters, or that Si self-interstitials drive pairing of some B and C during annealing [34]. The substitutional C which was incorporated into superlattice CSPE1 consists of a peak of 5xl0 18/cm 3 at a depth of -3000 A [Fig. 8(b)]. Figure 8(a) shows that the injection of interstitials in sample CSPE1 also enhances B diffusion, but the broadening of the B peaks in the C-rich region is much less pronounced than in reference sample SPEl. Figure 9 demonstrates that the interstitial-enhanced diffusion of B is reduced by a factor of -10 in the presence of C and approaches the equilibrium level. This unambiguously demonstrates that substitutional C acts as a trap for the Si self-interstitials injected from the near-surface implantation damage. For
 
 315
 
 790 °C, 10 min anneal 1000
 
 0 MBE + damage A SPE1 + damage CSPE + damage
 
 11 01
 
 _ SPEI (no damage)
 
 N.100
 
 ,E
 
 10-15
 
 •
 
 __
 
 m 1016
 
 10
 
 o 1017 0
 
 2000
 
 4000
 
 6000
 
 8000
 
 - Figure 9 Depth-dependence
 
 of the
 
 intrinsic
 
 B
 
 diffusivity showing the effect of solid phase
 
 epitaxy and C incorporation on the diffusion profile of ion-generated interstitials. Data were obtained by analyzing the B diffusion profiles in Figs. 2(a) and 8.
 
 1
 
 Depth (A)
 
 instance, C and interstitials might pair to form mobile CI complexes [35], followed by the nucleation and growth of larger carbon-interstitial agglomerates [36]. The strong interaction between C and interstitials suggests that C is the dominant impurity responsible for the occurrence of trap-limited interstitial diffusion in Si, as identified in the previous section. The trapping enthalpy of 2-2.5 eV derived from those experiments would then reflect the enthalpy with which interstitials are effectively bound to C-related traps. Carbon incorporation for suppressing TED In this section we will demonstrate that incorporating substitutional C in Si can also be used to suppress TED of a subsequently implanted dopant. Wafers of FZ Si(100) were amorphized to a depth of 2 jim at -77 K by a series of Si implants (as above). Part of the wafers was implanted with C at energies of 10, 28, 65, 130, 230, and 400 keV to doses of 1.3, 3.2, 6.0, 8.7, 11.3, and 13.3x10 13/cm 2, respectively, to uniformly raise the C level. Samples were annealed in vacuum at 500 "C for 1 h, 600 "C for 2 h, and 900 "C for 15 min to induce SPE and dissolve the 3 t 8 18 implanted C in the c-Si lattice. The obtained C level varies between 4x10 and 6x10 /cm throughout 1 jim of the sample closest to		
Data Loading...
 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	