Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to lapa
- PDF / 1,285,017 Bytes
- 9 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 78 Downloads / 156 Views
and Other Interventional Techniques
2020 SAGES ORAL
Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) results in improved recovery and similar reflux quality of life outcomes compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication Harry J Wong1,2 · Bailey Su1,2 · Mikhail Attaar1,2 · Kristine Kuchta1 · Stephen Stearns1 · John G Linn1 · Stephen P Haggerty1 · Woody Denham1 · Michael B Ujiki1 Received: 15 April 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020
Abstract Background Anti-reflux mucosectomy (ARMS) is a new endoscopic procedure involving a hemi-circumferential endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) around the gastroesophageal junction. We aim to compare perioperative and quality of life outcomes of patients with reflux who underwent ARMS to a comparable group who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (NF). Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained quality database was performed. All patients who underwent ARMS (n = 33) were matched with patients who underwent NF (n = 67). Clinical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were collected preoperatively and up to two years postoperatively, measured by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia Score. Outcomes were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher’s exact test. Results While 10 patients (30.3%) who underwent ARMS required additional laparoscopic anti-reflux operations, the ARMS group had shorter OR time (p
Data Loading...
