Correction to: Wastewater treatment of food industries through constructed wetland: a review
- PDF / 300,731 Bytes
- 2 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 75 Downloads / 202 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Wastewater treatment of food industries through constructed wetland: a review S. Sehar1
© Islamic Azad University (IAU) 2020
Correction to: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (2019) 16:6453–6472 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02472-7
There is a change in the authorship of the article since the original publication. A request from Dr. Nasser was received to remove his name from the authorship as he may not fully meet the authorship criteria. The authorship change has been approved by both authors. The correct authorship is mentioned above. Additionally, some minor corrections in Table 1 were made. The corrected table is given.
The following citation should be removed from the reference list. Maltais-Landry G, Chazarenc F, Comeau Y, Troesch S, Brisson J (2007) Effects of artificial aeration, macrophyte species, and loading rate on removal efficiency in constructed wetland mesocosms treating fish farm wastewater. J Environ Eng Sci 6:409–414
The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13762-019-02472-7. * S. Sehar [email protected] 1
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
13
Location COD
BOD5 – – – – 43.8 – – − 9.7 – – – – 66.6 68 – – – – – 82 81.7 – 83 – 53
90.8 90.1 – – 73.4 95 77.1 81.9 97 39 84–97 87 86.5 – 80.3 98 – 64.5 –
NO3–N
95 99 76 – 73.2 67–72
TSS
Removal performance (%)
Free water surface (FWS) Dairy WW Canada – 99 Potato farm WW Canada – 96 Sugar factory WW Kenya – – Dairy WW Ireland 95.8 Aquaculture WW China – – Aquaculture WW Germany 31 – Constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow (HF) Dairy WW Italy 92.5 93.7 Trout farm effluent Germany 67.2 88.7 Dairy WW Canada 95.8 – Dairy WW Italy – 92 Winery WW Spain 54.4 61.3 Dairy WW Australia – 66 Constructed wetlands with vertical sub-surface flow (VF) Livestock WW China – 81.3 Aquaculture WW China – 70.5 Oil-rich farm WW USA 94 96 Aquaculture WW Canada 56 53 Piggery and dairy WW Japan 91–96 94–98 Winery WW Spain 71.6 67.5 Livestock WW China 62.4 – Dairy WW Canada – – Cheese factory WW Italy 80.4 80.3 Hybrid constructed wetlands (HCW) Milking parlour WW Japan 88 89 Vinegar production WW Slovenia 67 66 Pig farm WW Mexico 86.3 – Pig farm WW Italy 79 –
Type of wastewater (WW)
– – 85 63
61.7 61.5 – – 40–85 – 95 – 39.1
– 82.9 95.2 17 – –
94 – 36 95.2 14.3 –
NH4–N
Table 1 Application of various types of constructed wetland for food industry wastewater treatment
76 62 77.9 61
48.9 20 73 58 71–90 57.6 80 58 –
60.6 40 69.6 40 – –
91 90 29 69.6 13.1 41–53
TP
4.5 20 – –
0.4 – – 1 cm/day 1 cm/day 17.6 0.125 – 0.05 m/day
6.3 0.9 l/s 250 – 25.5 mm/day –
1000 l/day – 77 mm/day 3.6–18.5 – 1.46–4.37
– 15 10 0.5
– – 5 – – – – – 5
– – 4 – – –
15 0.3 months – 4 – 0.5
Hydraulic loading Hydraulic retenrate (m3/day) tion time (days)
Sharma et al. (2010) Justin et al. (2009) Mora-Orozco et al. (2018) Borin et al. (
Data Loading...
