Early Treatment Uptake and Cost Burden of Hepatitis C Therapies Among Newly Diagnosed Hepatitis C Patients with a Partic

  • PDF / 938,606 Bytes
  • 16 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
  • 50 Downloads / 205 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Early Treatment Uptake and Cost Burden of Hepatitis C Therapies Among Newly Diagnosed Hepatitis C Patients with a Particular Focus on HIV Coinfection Sascha van Boemmel‑Wegmann1 · Vincent Lo Re III2 · Haesuk Park1  Received: 22 August 2019 / Accepted: 30 December 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Abstract Background  Despite the high efficacy and safety associated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), access to HCV treatment has been frequently restricted because of the high DAA drug costs. Objectives  To (1) compare HCV treatment initiation rates between HCV monoinfected and HCV/HIV coinfected patients before (pre-DAA period) and after (post-DAA period) all-oral DAAs became available; and to (2) estimate the HCV treatment costs for payers and patients. Research Design and Methods  A retrospective analysis of the M ­ arketScan® Databases (2009–2016) was conducted for newly diagnosed HCV patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of initiating HCV treatments during the pre-DAA and post-DAA periods. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare drug costs for dual, triple and all-oral therapies. Results  A total of 15,063 HCV patients [382 (2.5%) HIV coinfected] in the pre-DAA period and 14,896 [429 (2.9%) HIV coinfected] in the post-DAA period were included. HCV/HIV coinfected patients had lower odds of HCV treatment uptake compared to HCV monoinfected patients during the pre-DAA period [OR, 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.78], but no significant difference in odds of HCV treatment uptake was observed during the post-DAA period (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.87–1.33). From 2009 to 2016, average payers’ treatment costs (dual, $20,820; all-oral DAAs, $99,661; p