Epidemiology and genotyping of Anaplasma marginale and co-infection with piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae in cattle
- PDF / 1,215,570 Bytes
- 11 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 11 Downloads / 171 Views
rasites & Vectors Open Access
RESEARCH
Epidemiology and genotyping of Anaplasma marginale and co‑infection with piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae in cattle and buffaloes from Egypt Amira AL‑Hosary1,2, Cristian Răileanu2, Oliver Tauchmann2, Susanne Fischer2, Ard M. Nijhof3 and Cornelia Silaghi2,4*
Abstract Background: Anaplasma marginale is an obligate intracellular bacterium and the main cause of bovine anaplasmo‑ sis in tropical and subtropical regions. In Egypt, data regarding the prevalence of A. marginale in ruminant hosts and of the circulating genotypes is lacking. This study therefore aimed to (i) investigate the presence, epidemiology and genotypes of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes in Egypt, (ii) to evaluate suitable diagnostic tools and (iii) to identify co-infections of A. marginale with other selected tick-borne pathogens. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 394 animals (309 cattle and 85 buffaloes) from three different areas in Egypt. For the detection of A. marginale infection, several tests were compared for their sensitivity and specificity: blood smear analysis, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), PCR, real-time PCR and reverse line blot (RLB) assay. Co-infections with A. marginale, piroplasms and other Anaplasmataceae were surveyed by RLB while A. marginale genotypes were identified by amplifying and sequencing the partial msp1α gene. Results: Anaplasma marginale DNA was amplified by qPCR in 68.3% of cattle and 29.4% of buffaloes. RLB showed infection with A. marginale in 50.2% of cattle and 42.5% of buffaloes. Blood smear analysis detected this agent in 16.2% of cattle and 2.4% of buffaloes. ELISA showed specific antibodies against A. marginale in 54.9% of cattle. Anaplasma marginale was associated, in cattle and buffaloes, with several tick-borne pathogens (Theileria annulata, Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina, Babesia occultans and Anaplasma platys). A significant difference of A. marginale infec‑ tion level was noticed in cattle, where animals between 3–5-years-old had a higher prevalence (79.2%) compared to those older than 5 years (36.4%) and younger than 3 years (59.7%) and one year (64.5%), respectively (P = 0.002281). Microsatellite analysis identified 15 different genotypes. Conclusions: The epidemiological findings revealed high prevalence of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes in all the investigated areas. The circulation of diverse genotypes was observed, most of these A. marginale genotypes being specific for Egypt. The qPCR assay was confirmed to be the most sensitive tool for detection of A. marginale in cattle and buffaloes even in the carrier state, highlighting the importance of using suitable diagnostic tests. Keywords: Anaplasma marginale, Cattle, Buffaloes, Diagnostic tools, Genotypes, Co-infections, Egypt *Correspondence: [email protected] 2 Institute of Infectology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Sudufer 10, 17493 Greifswald‑Insel Riems, Germany Full list of author information is available at the
Data Loading...
