Correction to: Morphological variation of fine root systems and leaves in primary and secondary tropical forests of Hain
- PDF / 1,586,052 Bytes
- 3 Pages / 595.276 x 790.866 pts Page_size
- 30 Downloads / 203 Views
CORRECTION
Correction to: Morphological variation of fine root systems and leaves in primary and secondary tropical forests of Hainan Island, China J. Aaron Hogan1 · Oscar J. Valverde‑Barrantes1 · Qiong Ding2 · Han Xu1,3 · Christopher Baraloto1 Received: 13 October 2020 / Accepted: 19 October 2020 © INRAE and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2020
Correction to: Annals of Forest Science (2020) 77:76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00977-7
This correction stands to correct the listed errors in the original article: 1. In the Abstract, under the Results subheading, a sentence reads: “From secondary to primary forests, mean root system diameter increased 0.4 mm, mean specific root length decreased 3.5 m kg −1, and mean root system branching intensity decreased by 0.3 tips cm−1." The authors request this be changed and noted as: “From secondary to primary forests, mean root system diameter increased 0.4 mm, mean specific root length decreased 0.35 m g−1, and mean root system branching intensity decreased by 0.3 tips c m−1. 2. An error in the calculation of Specific Root Length (SRL) was identified, which resulted in the wrong units being presented in the published version. Thus, for the following paragraph found in the Results:
“Regarding root morphology, the predictedmarginal mean difference in SRL was on average about 3.5 m kg −1 greater in secondary than in primary forest (Fig. 4b). For example, in the secondary forest, values ranged from 26.0 (± 1.9) m kg−1 for species in the Annonaceae to 78.3 (± 1.1) for the Juglandaceae. In the primary forest, values ranged from 23.8 (± 1.1) m kg −1 for species in the Annonaceae to 71.9 (± 1.1) for the Juglandaceae.” The authors request this be changed and noted as: “Regarding root morphology, the predicted-marginal mean difference in SRL was on average about 0.35 m g−1 greater in secondary than in primary forest (Fig. 4b). For example, in the secondary forest, values ranged from 2.60 (± 0.06) m g −1 for species in the Annonaceae to 7.83 (± 0.06) for the Juglandaceae. In the primary forest, values ranged from 2.36 (± 0.06) m g−1 for species in the Annonaceae to 7.17 (± 0.06) for the Juglandaceae.” 3. The analysis of variance model for SRL was re-run, resulting in very minor changes. Thus, changes to the statistics for SRL in Table 2 are requested. The table in the published version reads:
The online version of the original article can be online at https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13595-020-00977-7. * J. Aaron Hogan [email protected] 1
Department of Biological Sciences, International Center for Tropical Botany, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
Research Center for Terrestrial Biodiversity of the South China Sea, Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
3
Trait (units)
Source
Specific root length Species (m kg−1) Forest type Species × Forest type Residuals
F
71 1 58
10.26 *** 0.238 7.10 ** 0.002 3.58 *** 0.054
1818
p
ω2
df
–
–
–
The authors request thi
Data Loading...
