Non-target effects of the exotic generalist parasitoid wasp Fopius arisanus (Sonan) estimated via competition assays aga

  • PDF / 282,026 Bytes
  • 14 Pages / 547.087 x 737.008 pts Page_size
  • 10 Downloads / 187 Views

DOWNLOAD

REPORT


(0123456789().,-volV) ( 01234567 89().,-volV)

Non-target effects of the exotic generalist parasitoid wasp Fopius arisanus (Sonan) estimated via competition assays against Doryctobracon areolatus (Szepligeti) on both native and exotic fruit fly hosts Beatriz A. G. Paranhos . Sonia Poncio . Renata Morelli . Dori E. Nava . Luiz A. N. de Sa´ . Nicholas C. Manoukis

Received: 28 March 2020 / Accepted: 8 October 2020  International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2020

Abstract Biological control by the generalist egg parasitoid Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) has been proposed against Bactrocera carambolae (Drew & Hancock) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in northern Brazil. This study assessed possible effects of F. arisanus on native parasitoids by focusing on competition with the native wasp Doryctobracon areolatus (Sze´pligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on two hosts, Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann), a native tephritid, and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), an introduced pest tephritid. Laboratory and greenhouse cage studies showed that F. arisanus parasitized \ 3% of the native host in competition or alone

Handling Editor: Debora Pires Paula.

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-020-10057-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. B. A. G. Paranhos (&) Laboratory of Entomology, Embrapa Semiarid Agriculture, Petrolina, PE, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] S. Poncio Federal Institute Farroupilha, Frederico Westphalen, RS, Brazil R. Morelli ProInsecta R&D, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil

compared to 41–65% for C. capitata, while D. areolatus parasitized 12–42% of the native host and \ 4% on C. capitata. The host origin of F. arisanus did not affect subsequent parasitism rates on native or exotic hosts. However, when reared on C. capitata, F. arisanus had higher parasitism on C. capitata than on A. fraterculus. Lab and greenhouse competition studies showed that F. arisanus had no measurable detrimental effect on the native parasitoid in either the native or introduced host, suggesting that F. arisanus interfered minimally with the native parasitoid. Based on these results and other relevant studies showing non-preference of F. arisanus for the native fruit fly species, as well as the non-preference of native parasitoids for exotic fruit flies, we infer that the release of F. arisanus against exotic tephritids such as C. capitata and B. carambolae in Brazil would not cause major disruption of the native populations of A. fraterculus parasitoids.

D. E. Nava Laboratory of Entomology, Embrapa Temperate Agriculture, Pelotas, RS, Brazil L. A. N. de Sa´ ‘‘Costa Lima’’ Quarantine Laboratory, Embrapa Environment, Jaguariu´na, SP, Brazil N. C. Manoukis USDA-ARS Daniel K. Inouye US Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, USA

123

B. A. G. Paranhos et al.

Keywords Hymenoptera  Braconidae  Diptera  Tephritidae  Ceratitis capitata  Anastrepha fraterculus

Introduction Global trade, increasi